| Literature DB >> 29483531 |
Neal T Halstead1,2, Christopher M Hoover3, Arathi Arakala4,5, David J Civitello6, Giulio A De Leo7,8, Manoj Gambhir4,9, Steve A Johnson10, Nicolas Jouanard11, Kristin A Loerns12, Taegan A McMahon13, Raphael A Ndione11, Karena Nguyen12, Thomas R Raffel14, Justin V Remais3, Gilles Riveau11,15, Susanne H Sokolow7,8, Jason R Rohr12.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is a snail-borne parasitic disease that ranks among the most important water-based diseases of humans in developing countries. Increased prevalence and spread of human schistosomiasis to non-endemic areas has been consistently linked with water resource management related to agricultural expansion. However, the role of agrochemical pollution in human schistosome transmission remains unexplored, despite strong evidence of agrochemicals increasing snail-borne diseases of wildlife and a projected 2- to 5-fold increase in global agrochemical use by 2050. Using a field mesocosm experiment, we show that environmentally relevant concentrations of fertilizer, a herbicide, and an insecticide, individually and as mixtures, increase densities of schistosome-infected snails by increasing the algae snails eat and decreasing densities of snail predators. Epidemiological models indicate that these agrochemical effects can increase transmission of schistosomes. Identifying agricultural practices or agrochemicals that minimize disease risk will be critical to meeting growing food demands while improving human wellbeing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29483531 PMCID: PMC5826950 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03189-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Top-down and bottom-up effects of agrochemicals on snail densities. Combined factor and path analysis (a), demonstrating top-down effects of chlorpyrifos increasing predator mortality (b) and snail density (c) and bottom-up effects of atrazine and fertilizer increasing snail density (d) through increased algal productivity (e). Size of arrows in a are scaled to the standardized coefficient (top number next to each arrow), with black and red arrows indicating positive and negative coefficients, respectively. Double-ended arrows exhibit significant covariation accounted for in the structural equation model. P-values for paths in the model are reported below each standardized coefficient. Boxes represent exogenous predictor variables, circles represent latent variables, and algal production was measured as a composite variable (hexagon). Indicator variables for latent and composite variables have been omitted from the figure to reduce visual complexity, but are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Importantly, the latent variable snail density represents the densities of all three snail species at multiple life stages (egg, hatchling, and adult), all of which exhibited similar responses across treatments. e represents the net main effects of fertilizer and atrazine presence on composite algal productivity. Axes on panels b–e are derived from latent variable scores for each replicate and thus have no units of measurement; however, raw data are available in the supplemental materials. PeQY = periphyton photosynthetic efficiency; PeF0 = periphyton chlorophyll a; Phyto = phytoplankton chlorophyll a and photosynthetic efficiency; At*Fe = atrazine x fertilizer interaction term
Fig. 2Actual number of infected Biomphalaria glabrata as a function of live Bi. glabrata at the end of the experiment. The response shown is restricted to mesocosm tanks in which infected Bi. glabrata were present (n = 15 mesocosms), effectively depicting the count portion of the zero-inflated model used to analyze effects on infected Bi. glabrata density. However, all 60 replicate mesocosms were used in the analysis (see Methods and Supplementary Table 2 for full model results). Live Bi. glabrata density was the only significant predictor of the count of infected Bi. glabrata in the model (other than spatial block) and explained 89% of the variation in the density of S. mansoni-infected Bi. glabrata in replicates in which infected snails were present. The solid line represents the predictions from a generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution including first- and second-degree polynomial terms for live Bi. glabrata density as predictors. Dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence band
Fig. 3Effects of agrochemical treatments on estimates of R0. Results of a mathematical model examining the influence of each agrochemical treatment from the mesocosm experiment on estimates of R0 (a), and drawing from other experiments that examine the same agrochemicals and affected pathways to investigate the concentration-dependent R0 of chlorpyrifos (b) and atrazine (c) as well as their combined influence (d). Estimates of R0 were derived from Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate uncertainty associated with both model fitting and agrochemical parameters (see supplementary text). Boxes in a represent the median and interquartile range (IQR), whiskers represent values within 1.5*IQR, and outliers (points outside of 1.5*IQR) are plotted as light gray points. When chlorpyrifos is absent, transmission is restricted by top-down regulation of the snail population, causing median R0 < 1 in the control and first three treatment groups. In the presence of chlorpyrifos, median R0 estimates are >1, suggesting endemic transmission, and bottom-up effects from atrazine and/or fertilizer act in conjunction with top-down effects to further increase median R0 estimates. Maximum R0 in b is achieved when chlorpyrifos concentration is sufficient to eliminate the predator population, as in the mesocosm (64 µg/L). In a predator-free setting, R0 is equivalent to that estimated from the fitted model at baseline, but rises as atrazine concentration (log+1 transformed) increases due to bottom-up stimulation of the snail population. Dashed lines in b, c represent, respectively, the 95% confidence interval of predator mortality across the indicated range of chlorpyrifos concentration as estimated in ref.[35] and the 95% confidence interval of snail density dependence increases across the indicated range of atrazine concentrations as estimated from ref.[60]. Expected values of R0 driven by mixtures of atrazine acting on snail population dynamics as in ref.[60], and the chlorpyrifos acting on snail predators as in ref.[35] show that agrochemical mixtures have a pronounced influence on transmission intensity (d)