Literature DB >> 29483205

Decreasing mortality and changes in treatment patterns in patients with acromegaly from a nationwide study.

Daniela Esposito1, Oskar Ragnarsson1, Daniel Granfeldt2, Tom Marlow2, Gudmundur Johannsson1, Daniel S Olsson1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: New therapeutic strategies have developed for the management of acromegaly over recent decades. Whether this has improved mortality has not been fully elucidated.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to investigate mortality in a nationwide unselected cohort of patients with acromegaly. Secondary analyses included time trends in mortality and treatment patterns.
DESIGN: A total of 1089 patients with acromegaly were identified in Swedish National Health Registries between 1987 and 2013. To analyse time trends, the cohort was divided into three periods (1987-1995, 1996-2004 and 2005-2013) based on the year of diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the Swedish population as reference, standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Overall SMR was 2.79 (95% CI: 2.43-3.15) with 232 observed and 83 expected deaths. Mortality was mainly related to circulatory diseases (SMR: 2.95, 95% CI: 2.35-3.55), including ischemic heart disease (2.00, 1.35-2.66) and cerebrovascular disease (3.99, 2.42-5.55) and malignancy (1.76, 1.27-2.26). Mortality decreased over time, with an SMR of 3.45 (2.87-4.02) and 1.86 (1.04-2.67) during the first and last time period, respectively (P = .015). During the same time periods, the frequency of pituitary surgery increased from 58% to 72% (P < 0.001) and the prevalence of hypopituitarism decreased from 41% to 23% (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Excess mortality was found in this nationwide cohort of patients with acromegaly, mainly related to circulatory and malignant diseases. Although still high, mortality significantly declined over time. This could be explained by the more frequent use of pituitary surgery, decreased prevalence of hypopituitarism and the availability of new medical treatment options.
© 2018 European Society of Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483205     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  11 in total

1.  Mammosomatotroph and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma in acromegaly: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Liang Lv; Yong Jiang; Senlin Yin; Yu Hu; Cheng Chen; Weichao Ma; Shu Jiang; Peizhi Zhou
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Development and assessment of machine learning algorithms for predicting remission after transsphenoidal surgery among patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Yanghua Fan; Yansheng Li; Yichao Li; Shanshan Feng; Xinjie Bao; Ming Feng; Renzhi Wang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Size Matters: Rethinking of the Sizing Classification of Pituitary Adenomas Based on the Rates of Surgery: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study of 29,651 Patients.

Authors:  Abhiraj D Bhimani; Alexander J Schupper; Gregory D Arnone; Deeksha Chada; Anisse N Chaker; Nicki Mohammadi; Costas G Hadjipanayis; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-09-10

4.  Quality of Life in Patients with Acromegaly before and after Transsphenoidal Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Shiyuan Xiang; Min He; Meng Wang; Yanfang Gu; Lingjuan Li; Zhiwen Yin
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Acromegaly: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Lima Lawrence; Kenda Alkwatli; James Bena; Richard Prayson; Varun Kshettry; Pablo Recinos; Betul Hatipoglu; Kevin M Pantalone; Robert Weil; Amir H Hamrahian; Laurence Kennedy; Divya Yogi-Morren
Journal:  Clin Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-20

6.  Patient Characteristics, Diagnostic Delays, Treatment Patterns, Treatment Outcomes, Comorbidities, and Treatment Costs of Acromegaly in China: A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Guo; Kailu Wang; Siyue Yu; Lu Gao; Zihao Wang; Huijuan Zhu; Bing Xing; Shuyang Zhang; Dong Dong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and Italian AACE Chapter Position Statement for Clinical Practice: Acromegaly - Part 1: Diagnostic and Clinical Issues.

Authors:  Renato Cozzi; Maria R Ambrosio; Roberto Attanasio; Alessandro Bozzao; Laura De Marinis; Ernesto De Menis; Edoardo Guastamacchia; Andrea Lania; Giovanni Lasio; Francesco Logoluso; Pietro Maffei; Maurizio Poggi; Vincenzo Toscano; Michele Zini; Philippe Chanson; Laurence Katznelson
Journal:  Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines.

Authors:  Maria Fleseriu; Beverly M K Biller; Pamela U Freda; Monica R Gadelha; Andrea Giustina; Laurence Katznelson; Mark E Molitch; Susan L Samson; Christian J Strasburger; A J van der Lely; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Paltusotine, a novel oral once-daily nonpeptide SST2 receptor agonist, suppresses GH and IGF-1 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ajay Madan; Stacy Markison; Stephen F Betz; Alan Krasner; Rosa Luo; Theresa Jochelson; Jason Lickliter; R Scott Struthers
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Metabolic Fingerprint of Acromegaly and its Potential Usefulness in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Betina Biagetti; J R Herance; Roser Ferrer; Anna Aulinas; Martina Palomino-Schätzlein; Jordi Mesa; J P Castaño; Raul M Luque; Rafael Simó
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.