Verena Haselmann1, Christoffer Gebhardt2,3,4, Ingrid Brechtel1, Angelika Duda1, Claudia Czerwinski1, Antje Sucker5, Tim Holland-Letz6, Jochen Utikal2,3, Dirk Schadendorf5, Michael Neumaier7. 1. Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Centre, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. 2. Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. 4. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. 5. Department of Dermatology, University of Essen Hospital, Essen, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. 6. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Biostatistics, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Centre, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; michael.neumaier@umm.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current standard for determining eligibility of patients with metastatic melanoma for BRAF-targeted therapy is tissue-based testing of BRAF mutations. As patients are rarely rebiopsied, detection in blood might be advantageous by enabling a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real time and thereby representing a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring BRAF therapy. METHODS: In all, 634 stage I to IV melanoma patients were enrolled at 2 centers, and 1406 plasma samples were prospectively collected. Patients were assigned to 3 separate study cohorts: study 1 for assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as part of companion diagnostics, study 2 for assessment of ctDNA for patients with low tumor burden and for follow-up, and study 3 for monitoring of resistance to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Overall, a high degree of concordance between plasma and tissue testing results was observed at 90.9% (study 1) and 90.1% (study 2), respectively. Interestingly, discrepant results were in some cases associated with nonresponse to BRAFi (n = 3) or a secondary BRAF-mutant malignancy (n = 5). Importantly, ctDNA results correlated with the clinical course of disease in 95.7% and with response to treatment. Significantly, the detection of BRAF mutant ctDNA preceded relapse assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and was more specific than serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based testing compares favorably with standard-of-care tissue-based BRAF mutation testing. Importantly, blood-based BRAF testing correlates with the clinical course, even for early-stage patients, and may be used to predict response to treatment, recurrence, and resistance before radioimaging under BRAFi therapy, thereby enabling considerable improvements in patient treatment.
BACKGROUND: The current standard for determining eligibility of patients with metastatic melanoma for BRAF-targeted therapy is tissue-based testing of BRAF mutations. As patients are rarely rebiopsied, detection in blood might be advantageous by enabling a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real time and thereby representing a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring BRAF therapy. METHODS: In all, 634 stage I to IV melanomapatients were enrolled at 2 centers, and 1406 plasma samples were prospectively collected. Patients were assigned to 3 separate study cohorts: study 1 for assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as part of companion diagnostics, study 2 for assessment of ctDNA for patients with low tumor burden and for follow-up, and study 3 for monitoring of resistance to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Overall, a high degree of concordance between plasma and tissue testing results was observed at 90.9% (study 1) and 90.1% (study 2), respectively. Interestingly, discrepant results were in some cases associated with nonresponse to BRAFi (n = 3) or a secondary BRAF-mutant malignancy (n = 5). Importantly, ctDNA results correlated with the clinical course of disease in 95.7% and with response to treatment. Significantly, the detection of BRAF mutant ctDNA preceded relapse assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and was more specific than serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase. CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based testing compares favorably with standard-of-care tissue-based BRAF mutation testing. Importantly, blood-based BRAF testing correlates with the clinical course, even for early-stage patients, and may be used to predict response to treatment, recurrence, and resistance before radioimaging under BRAFi therapy, thereby enabling considerable improvements in patient treatment.
Authors: Holli A Loomans-Kropp; Yurong Song; Manish Gala; Aparna R Parikh; Emily E Van Seventer; Rocio Alvarez; Megan P Hitchins; Robert H Shoemaker; Asad Umar Journal: Cancer Res Commun Date: 2022-02-11
Authors: Mark William Linder; Michael E Egger; Tracy Van Meter; Shesh N Rai; Roland Valdes; Melissa Barousse Hall; Xiaoyong Wu; Norah Alghamdi; Jason A Chesney Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Leslie Calapre; Tindaro Giardina; Cleo Robinson; Anna L Reid; Zeyad Al-Ogaili; Michelle R Pereira; Ashleigh C McEvoy; Lydia Warburton; Nicholas K Hayward; Muhammad A Khattak; Tarek M Meniawy; Michael Millward; Benhur Amanuel; Melanie Ziman; Elin S Gray Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Teofila Seremet; Yanina Jansen; Simon Planken; Hassan Njimi; Mélanie Delaunoy; Hakim El Housni; Gil Awada; Julia Katharina Schwarze; Marleen Keyaerts; Hendrik Everaert; Danielle Lienard; Véronique Del Marmol; Pierre Heimann; Bart Neyns Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Renáta Váraljai; Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht; Teofila Seremet; Joey Mark S Diaz; Jérémie Nsengimana; Antje Sucker; Klaus Griewank; Jan-Malte Placke; Peter A Horn; Nils von Neuhoff; Batool Shannan; Heike Chauvistré; Felix C E Vogel; Susanne Horn; Jürgen C Becker; Julia Newton-Bishop; Andreas Stang; Bart Neyns; Benjamin Weide; Dirk Schadendorf; Alexander Roesch Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2019-02-15