| Literature DB >> 29482664 |
Alisa Domnina1, Polina Novikova2, Julia Obidina3, Irina Fridlyanskaya3, Larisa Alekseenko3, Irina Kozhukharova3, Olga Lyublinskaya3, Valeriy Zenin3, Nikolay Nikolsky3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asherman's syndrome (AS) is one of the gynecological disorders caused by the destruction of the endometrium. For some cases of AS available surgical methods and hormonal therapy are ineffective. Stem cell transplantation may offer a potential alternative for AS cure.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Asherman’s syndrome; Cell spheroids; Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29482664 PMCID: PMC5828181 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0801-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Primer sequences for control and target genes and q-PCR conditions
| Symbol | Primer sequence | Amplification conditions | PCR product size (bp) | Accession number | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSG-6 | S: GATGGATGGCTAAGGGCAGAGT-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 61 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 208 | NM_007115.3 | Liu et al. 2016 [ |
| AS: TCATTTGGGAAGCCTGGAGATT-3′ | |||||
| EP2 | S: 5-CCACCTCATTCTCCTGGCTA-3 | 93 °C, 20 s, 62 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 216 | NM_000956.3 | Kunisch et al. 2009 [ |
| AS: 5-CGACAACAGAGGACTGAACG-3 | |||||
| HGF | S: 5′-CTCACACCCGCTGGGAGTAC-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 62 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 104 | XM_011516115.2 | Jankowski et al. 2003 [ |
| AS: 5′-TCCTTGACCTTGGATGCATTC-3′ | |||||
| RUNX2 | S: GCCTTCAAGGTGGTAGCCC-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 62 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 67 | XM_017011396.1 | Shafiee et al. 2011 [ |
| AS: CGTTACCCGCCATGACAGTA-3′ | |||||
| OPN | S: 5′-TTGCAGCCTTCTCAGCCA-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 62 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 76 | NM_001251830.1 | Bahrambeigi et al. 2012 [ |
| AS: 5′-GGAGGCAAAAGCAAATCACTG-3′ | |||||
| FABP4 | S: 5′-ATGGGATGGAAAATCAACCA-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 59 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 87 | NM_001442.2 | Ponnaiyan et al. 2014 [ |
| AS: 5′-GTGGAAGTGACGCCTTTCAT-3′ | |||||
| GAPDH | S: 5′-GACTCATGACCACAGTCCATGC-3′ | 93 °C, 20 s, 67 °C, 20 s 72 °C 30 s | 112 | NM_001289746.1 | Liang et al. 2015 [ |
| AS: 5′-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3′ | |||||
| NANOG | S: 5′-CAAAGGCAAACAACCCACT-3′ | 93 °C, 30 s, 60 °C, 30 s 72 °C 30 s | 427 | NM_024865.2 | Kozhukharova et al., 2009 [ |
| AS: 5′-CTGGATGTTCTGGGTCTGGT-3′ | |||||
| OCT4 | S:5′-AGCCCTCATTTCACCAGGCC-3′ | 93 °C, 30 s, 63 °C, 30 s 72 °C 30 s | 456 | NM_002701.5 | Liedtke et al., 2007 [ |
| AS:5′-TGGGACTCCTCCGGGTTTTG-3′ | |||||
| SOX2 | S:5′ GCGCATGGACAGTTACGC-3′ | 93 °C, 30 s, 60 °C, 30 s 72 °C 30 s | 276 | NM_003106.3 | Koshkin et al. 2016 [ |
| AS: 5′ TCGGACTTGACCACCGAAC-3′ | |||||
| ACTIN | S:5′-GCCGAGCGGGAAATCGTGCGT-3′ | 93 °C, 30 s, 70 °C, 30 s 72 °C 30 s | 507 | NM_001101.3 | Alekseenko et al., 2012 [ |
| AS:-5’-CGGTGGACGATGGAGGGGCCG-3′ |
Fig. 1Stem properties of eMSC spheroids. a eMSC monolayer; b eMSC in spheroids; c eMSC after spheroids dissociation, d pluripotent gene expression in MSC spheroids and human embryonic stem cells (ESC). eMSC endometrial mesenchymal stem cells
CD expression in eMSC monolayer and spheroids
| CD marker | eMSC monolayer | eMSC spheroids |
|---|---|---|
| CD34 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| CD 44 | 91.50% | 91.00% |
| CD 45 | 8.10% | 0.00% |
| CD 73 | 96.80% | 95.10% |
| CD 90 | 91.40% | 91.00% |
| CD 105 | 95.40% | 71.70% |
| CD 140b | 90.30% | 75.90% |
| CD 146 | 58.30% | 0.30% |
| HLA-1 | 91.60% | 91.00% |
| HLA-DR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fig. 2Multipotency of eMSC spheroids. a adipogenic differentiation of eMSC spheroid; b osteogenic differentiation of eMSC spheroids; c, d expression of genes involved in adipogenic (c) and osteogenic (d) differentiation
Fig. 3Proliferation and senescence of eMSC spheroids. a, b β-galactosidase activity in eMSC after spheroids dissociation and subculturing for 2 (a) and 15 (b) passages; c, d cell cycle analysis of eMSC spheroids (c) and monolayer cells (d)
Fig. 4Decidual differentiation of eMSC spheroids. a eMSC spheroids, control cells; b eMSC spheroids, treated with 1 mM 8-Br-cAMP for 7 days; c, d ELISA assay of prolactin (c) and IGFBP-1 (d) secretion of control and induced to decidual differentiation eMSC spheroids and monolayer cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Two-tailed Students t test was utilized for pairwise comparison. *p < 0.01 vs. control undifferentiated cells. eMSC endometrial mesenchymal stem cells, IGFBP-1 insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1
Fig. 5q-RT-PCR assay of TSG6, EP2, and HSF genes in eMSC spheroids and monolayer cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Two-tailed Student’s t test was utilized for pairwise comparison. *p < 0.01 vs. eMSC in monolayer. eMSC endometrial mesenchymal stem cells, EP2 prostaglandin E receptor, HGF hepatocyte growth factor, TSG-6 tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein 6
Fig. 6Histological assay of uterus injury in AS modeling rats. a Rat uterus without injury (H&E), b rat uterus three estrus cycles after injury (H&E); c rat uterus without injury (Trichrome staining), d rat uterus three estrus cycles after injury (Trichrome staining). Magnification: ×1000
Fig. 7Number of pups (a) and pregnancy rate (b) in rats with modeled AS after intravenous or intrauterine transplantation of eMSC and rat BM. a **p < 0.01, animals received intravenous or intrauterine cell transplantation vs. PBS; *p < 0.01, eMSC spheroids vs. BM or monolayer eMSC transplantation. (Kruskal-Wallis H-test followed by Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction). b **p < 0.05, animals received intravenous or intrauterine cell transplantation vs. PBS. (Fisher’s exact test). BM rat bone marrow, eMSC endometrial mesenchymal stem cells