| Literature DB >> 29482593 |
Ana Carolina Cuéllar1, Lene Jung Kjær2, Carsten Kirkeby2, Henrik Skovgard3, Søren Achim Nielsen4, Anders Stockmarr5, Gunnar Andersson6, Anders Lindstrom6, Jan Chirico6, Renke Lühken7, Sonja Steinke8, Ellen Kiel8, Jörn Gethmann9, Franz J Conraths9, Magdalena Larska10, Inger Hamnes11, Ståle Sviland11, Petter Hopp11, Katharina Brugger12, Franz Rubel12, Thomas Balenghien13, Claire Garros13, Ignace Rakotoarivony13, Xavier Allène13, Jonathan Lhoir13, David Chavernac13, Jean-Claude Delécolle14, Bruno Mathieu14, Delphine Delécolle14, Marie-Laure Setier-Rio15, Roger Venail15,16, Bethsabée Scheid15, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca17, Carlos Barceló17, Javier Lucientes18, Rosa Estrada18, Alexander Mathis19, Wesley Tack16, Rene Bødker2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biting midges of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are vectors of bluetongue virus (BTV), African horse sickness virus and Schmallenberg virus (SBV). Outbreaks of both BTV and SBV have affected large parts of Europe. The spread of these diseases depends largely on vector distribution and abundance. The aim of this analysis was to identify and quantify major spatial patterns and temporal trends in the distribution and seasonal variation of observed Culicoides abundance in nine countries in Europe.Entities:
Keywords: Culicoides abundance; Culicoides distribution; Europe; Seasonal abundance; Spatial pattern; Temporal trend; Vector season; Vector-borne disease
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29482593 PMCID: PMC5828119 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2706-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Available data from sampled farms in Europe during entomological surveys from 2007 to 2013. Latitudinal ranges were defined for every 5 degrees of latitude. From south to north, latitudinal ranges were named A, B, C, D, E, F and G
Number of farms sampled, number of collections, trap type used, frequency of trapping, sampling protocol per country and number of Culicoides specimens trapped (without applying conversion factor)
| National survey | Details | No. of farms sampled | No. of collections | Trap type | Frequency | Sampling protocol (nights) | Total no. of Obsoletus ensemble | Total no. of Pulicaris ensemble | Total no. of | Total no. of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 1095 | Onderstepoort | Daily | 1 | 16,338 | 1888 | 0 | 18,226 | |
| Denmark 1 | 2008–2009 | 343 | 1087 | Onderstepoort | 1 per month | 1 | 193,795 | 174,475 | 0 | 368,270 |
| Denmark 2 | 2010 winter surveillance | 31 | 233 | Onderstepoort | 1–5 per month | 1 | 297 | 222 | 0 | 519 |
| Denmark 3 | 2012–2013 summer surveillance | 4 | 102 | Onderstepoort | 1–5 per month | 2 (2013); 3 (2014) | 79,796 | 61,121 | 0 | 140,917 |
| Total Denmark | 350 | 1422 | Onderstepoort | 1–5 per month | 1–3 | 273,888 | 235,818 | 0 | 509,706 | |
| France | 192 | 10,947 | Onderstepoort | 1–5 per month | 1 | 3,728,710 | 154,742 | 258,904 | 3,728,710 | |
| Germany 1 | 2007–2008 | 89 | 1244 | BG-Sentinel | Monthly | 7 | 901,235 | 203,101 | 0 | 1,104,336 |
| Germany 2 | 3 campaigns: Aug-Sep 2012, April-May 2013, June 2013 | 21 | 664 | BG-Sentinel | 1 per period | 14 | 46,895 | 38,465 | 0 | 85,360 |
| Total Germany | 110 | 1908 | BG-Sentinel | 7 and 14 | 948,130 | 241,566 | 0 | 1,189,696 | ||
| Norway | 29 | 698 | Onderstepoort | 1–10 per month | 1 | 1,274,685 | 77,662 | 0 | 1,352,347 | |
| Poland | 19 | 559 | Onderstepoort | Weekly | 1 | 277,546 | 160,751 | 0 | 438,297 | |
| Spain | 168 | 12,724 | Mini CDC | 1–14 per month | 1 | 254,331 | 35,799 | 196,324 | 486,454 | |
| Sweden | 23 | 363 | Onderstepoort | Weekly | 1 | 60,052 | 14,979 | 0 | 75,031 | |
| Switzerland | 12 | 1713 | Onderstepoort | Weekly | 1–2 | 489,789 | 141,091 | 0 | 630,880 | |
| Total | 904 | 31,429 | 7,323,469 | 1,064,299 | 455,228 | 8,842,998 |
Fig. 2Left column: Obsoletus ensemble weekly average (log scale) with 10th and 90th percentiles for an average year per latitudinal zone (A-F). Right column: cumulative weekly number of vectors per year, by latitudinal zone. The latitudinal zones ranged from southern Spain (A) to the northern Scandinavia (F)
Fig. 3Left column: Pulicaris ensemble weekly average (log scale) with 10th and 90th percentiles for an average year per latitudinal zone (A-F). Right column: cumulative weekly number of vectors per year, by latitudinal zone. The latitudinal zones ranged from southern Spain (A) to the northern Scandinavia (F)
Fig. 4Left column: C. imicola weekly average (log scale) with 10th and 90th percentiles for an average year per latitudinal zone (A-B). Right column: number of vectors per year, calculated as the cumulative sum of the weekly average multiplied by 7, by latitudinal range
Fig. 5Obsoletus ensemble monthly mean abundance. Dots show observed monthly mean abundance at sampled farms. Spatially interpolated abundance is shown in color. Interpolation values are displayed on the same scale as the observed abundance
Fig. 6Pulicaris ensemble monthly mean abundance. Dots indicate observed monthly mean abundance in sampled farms. Spatially interpolated abundance is shown in color. Interpolation values are displayed on the same scale as the observed abundance
Fig. 7C. imicola monthly mean abundance. Dots indicate observed monthly mean abundance in sampled farms. Spatially interpolated abundance is shown in color. Interpolation values are displayed on the same scale as the observed abundance
Fig. 8Start of the vector season for the Obsoletus ensemble by NUTS 3 polygons and by month
Fig. 9Start of the vector season for the Pulicaris ensemble by NUTS 3 polygons and by month
Fig. 10Start of the vector season for C. imicola by NUTS 3 polygons and by months