Angela Rosenbohm1, Gabriele Nagel2, Raphael S Peter2, Torben Brehme2, Wolfgang Koenig3,4,5, Luc Dupuis6, Dietrich Rothenbacher2, Albert C Ludolph1. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 2. Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 3. Department of Internal Medicine II-Cardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Ulm, Germany. 4. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 5. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich. 6. Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale Unité 1118, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract
Importance: Knowledge about the metabolic states of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may provide a therapeutic approach. Objective: To investigate the association between the onset and prognosis of ALS and serum retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) concentration as a biomarker for insulin resistance and vitamin A metabolism. Design, Setting, and Participants: Case-control design for risk factors of ALS; cohort design for prognostic factors within ALS cases. Between October 1, 2010, and June 30, 2014, a population-based case-control study with randomly selected controls was established based on the ALS Registry Swabia in southern Germany, with a target population of 8.4 million inhabitants. Response rates were 64.8% among the cases and 18.7% among the controls. The dates of analysis were April 2016 to May 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Serum samples were measured for RBP4. Information on covariates was assessed by an interview-based standardized questionnaire. Main outcomes and measures were adjusted odds ratios for risk of ALS associated with serum RBP4 concentration, as well as time to death associated with RBP4 concentration at baseline in ALS cases only. Conditional logistic regression was applied to calculate multivariable odds ratios for risk of ALS. Survival models were used in cases only to appraise their prognostic value. Results: Data from 289 patients with ALS (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [10.5] years; 172 [59.5%] male) and 504 controls (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [9.8] years; 299 [59.3%] male) were included in the case-control study. Compared with controls, ALS cases were characterized by lower body mass index, less educational attainment, smoking, light occupational work intensity, and self-reported diabetes. The median serum RBP4 concentration was lower in ALS cases than in controls (54.0 vs 59.5 mg/L). In the multivariable model, increasing RBP4 concentration was associated with reduced odds for ALS (top vs bottom quartile odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.59; P for trend <.001), which persisted after further adjustment for renal function and for leptin and adiponectin. Among 279 ALS cases during a median follow-up of 14.5 months, 104 died (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [10.3] years; 56 [53.9%] male). In this ALS cohort, an inverse association was found between serum RBP4 concentration as a continuous measure and survival. Conclusions and Relevance: RBP4 was inversely related to risk for and prognosis of ALS, suggesting that vitamin A metabolism or impaired insulin signaling could be involved. Further research, including a prospective design and other biological markers, is necessary to clarify the role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of ALS.
Importance: Knowledge about the metabolic states of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may provide a therapeutic approach. Objective: To investigate the association between the onset and prognosis of ALS and serum retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) concentration as a biomarker for insulin resistance and vitamin A metabolism. Design, Setting, and Participants: Case-control design for risk factors of ALS; cohort design for prognostic factors within ALS cases. Between October 1, 2010, and June 30, 2014, a population-based case-control study with randomly selected controls was established based on the ALS Registry Swabia in southern Germany, with a target population of 8.4 million inhabitants. Response rates were 64.8% among the cases and 18.7% among the controls. The dates of analysis were April 2016 to May 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Serum samples were measured for RBP4. Information on covariates was assessed by an interview-based standardized questionnaire. Main outcomes and measures were adjusted odds ratios for risk of ALS associated with serum RBP4 concentration, as well as time to death associated with RBP4 concentration at baseline in ALS cases only. Conditional logistic regression was applied to calculate multivariable odds ratios for risk of ALS. Survival models were used in cases only to appraise their prognostic value. Results: Data from 289 patients with ALS (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [10.5] years; 172 [59.5%] male) and 504 controls (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [9.8] years; 299 [59.3%] male) were included in the case-control study. Compared with controls, ALS cases were characterized by lower body mass index, less educational attainment, smoking, light occupational work intensity, and self-reported diabetes. The median serum RBP4 concentration was lower in ALS cases than in controls (54.0 vs 59.5 mg/L). In the multivariable model, increasing RBP4 concentration was associated with reduced odds for ALS (top vs bottom quartile odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.59; P for trend <.001), which persisted after further adjustment for renal function and for leptin and adiponectin. Among 279 ALS cases during a median follow-up of 14.5 months, 104 died (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [10.3] years; 56 [53.9%] male). In this ALS cohort, an inverse association was found between serum RBP4 concentration as a continuous measure and survival. Conclusions and Relevance: RBP4 was inversely related to risk for and prognosis of ALS, suggesting that vitamin A metabolism or impaired insulin signaling could be involved. Further research, including a prospective design and other biological markers, is necessary to clarify the role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of ALS.
Authors: Johannes Dorst; Luc Dupuis; Susanne Petri; Katja Kollewe; Susanne Abdulla; Joachim Wolf; Markus Weber; David Czell; Christian Burkhardt; Frank Hanisch; Stefan Vielhaber; Thomas Meyer; Gabriele Frisch; Dagmar Kettemann; Torsten Grehl; Bertold Schrank; Albert C Ludolph Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-01-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Ran S Rotem; Ryan M Seals; Ole Gredal; Johnni Hansen; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Timothy E Graham; Qin Yang; Matthias Blüher; Ann Hammarstedt; Theodore P Ciaraldi; Robert R Henry; Christopher J Wason; Andreas Oberbach; Per-Anders Jansson; Ulf Smith; Barbara B Kahn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B Kuraszkiewicz; H Goszczyńska; T Podsiadły-Marczykowska; M Piotrkiewicz; P Andersen; M Gromicho; J Grosskreutz; M Kuźma-Kozakiewicz; S Petri; B Stubbendorf; K Szacka; H Uysal; M de Carvalho Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.677