S Weidberg1, G Vallejo-Seco2, A González-Roz2, Á García-Pérez2, R Secades-Villa2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijóo s/n, Oviedo 33003, Spain. Electronic address: weidbergsara.uo@uniovi.es. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijóo s/n, Oviedo 33003, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite previous evidence supporting the use of the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) as a valid tool for assessing smoking reinforcement, research assessing how environmental changes affect CPT performance is scarce. AIMS: This study addressed for the first time the differential effect of treatment condition [Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) + Behavioral Activation (BA) versus CBT + BA + Contingency Management (CM)] on cigarette demand among treatment seeking smokers with depressive symptoms. It also sought to assess whether reductions in smoking consumption arranged over the course of an intervention for smoking cessation impact on in-treatment cigarette demand. METHOD:Participants were 92 smokers with depressive symptoms from a randomized clinical trial that received eight weeks of either CBT + BA or CBT + BA + CM. Individuals completed the CPT 8 times; the first during the intake visit and the remaining 7 scheduled once a week in midweek sessions. Cotinine samples were collected in each session. RESULTS: Participants receiving CBT + BA + CM showed higher reduction in cigarette demand across sessions than participants receiving CBT + BA, although this comparison was only significant for the intensity index (p = .004). Cotinine was positively related to cigarette demand (all p values < .001), although this association became less prominent across sessions. In-treatment cotinine decreases were associated with demand reductions (all p values < .001), but this association was not significant for elasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in nicotine intake arranged over the course of an intervention for smoking cessation impact in-treatment cigarette demand.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Despite previous evidence supporting the use of the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) as a valid tool for assessing smoking reinforcement, research assessing how environmental changes affect CPT performance is scarce. AIMS: This study addressed for the first time the differential effect of treatment condition [Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) + Behavioral Activation (BA) versus CBT + BA + Contingency Management (CM)] on cigarette demand among treatment seeking smokers with depressive symptoms. It also sought to assess whether reductions in smoking consumption arranged over the course of an intervention for smoking cessation impact on in-treatment cigarette demand. METHOD:Participants were 92 smokers with depressive symptoms from a randomized clinical trial that received eight weeks of either CBT + BA or CBT + BA + CM. Individuals completed the CPT 8 times; the first during the intake visit and the remaining 7 scheduled once a week in midweek sessions. Cotinine samples were collected in each session. RESULTS:Participants receiving CBT + BA + CM showed higher reduction in cigarette demand across sessions than participants receiving CBT + BA, although this comparison was only significant for the intensity index (p = .004). Cotinine was positively related to cigarette demand (all p values < .001), although this association became less prominent across sessions. In-treatment cotinine decreases were associated with demand reductions (all p values < .001), but this association was not significant for elasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in nicotine intake arranged over the course of an intervention for smoking cessation impact in-treatment cigarette demand.
Authors: Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; Gema Aonso-Diego; Sara Weidberg; José R Fernández-Hermida Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530