Literature DB >> 29481870

Circulating Plasma Cells at the Time of Collection of Autologous PBSC for Transplant in Multiple Myeloma Patients is a Negative Prognostic Factor Even in the Age of Post-Transplant Maintenance Therapy.

Andrew J Cowan1, Philip A Stevenson2, Edward N Libby1, Pamela S Becker3, David G Coffey1, Damian J Green1, Teresa S Hyun4, Jonathan R Fromm5, Ajay K Gopal1, Leona A Holmberg6.   

Abstract

Circulating plasma cells (CPCs) have been detected in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at various stages of disease and associated with worse outcomes. Little data exist regarding the impact of CPCs at the time of autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection on outcomes, and the impact of maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on prognosis in patients with CPC-containing collections. All patients with MM who underwent first ASCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center from 2012 to 2015 and had evaluation for CPCs at the time of PBSC collection were included in our analysis. Seven-color flow cytometry was used to detect the presence of CPCs. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to generate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates from the time of ASCT. A multivariate analysis, including receipt of maintenance therapy post-ASCT, high-risk cytogenetics, and international staging system (ISS) stage, was included in a Cox proportional hazards regression model for associations with OS and PFS. We identified 227 patients with MM who underwent ASCT; of these, 144 (63.4%) patients had routine assessment of CPCs at the time of PBSC collection. One hundred seventeen (81.3%) patients did not have CPCs and 27 (18.8%) did have CPCs. The presence of CPCs was highly associated with poorer PFS (P = .031 by log-rank analysis), but did not affect OS. The median PFS for those patients without CPCs was 39.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.1 to not reached), while the median PFS for those patients with CPCs was 16.5 months (95% CI, 13.7 to not reached). A subgroup analysis of patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better at time of collection, showed the median PFS for patients without CPCs was 38.3 months (95% CI, 29 to not reached), as compared with those patients with CPCs, where it was only 16.5 months (95% CI, 12 months to not reached; P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS among those patients achieving partial response at the time of collection. In a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for post-ASCT maintenance therapy, high-risk cytogenetics, and ISS stage at time of initial diagnosis, there was a 43% higher risk of progression or death among the patients with CPCs (P = .04). The presence of CPCs at the time of autologous PBSC collection is a negative prognostic factor for risk of early relapse or death despite the advent of novel agents and maintenance strategies. The impact of CPCs was most significant among patients achieving a VGPR or better at time of collection. The presence of CPCs denotes a unique group of high-risk MM patients for whom alternative treatment strategies are needed to overcome resistance to current standard therapies.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous transplantation; Circulating plasma cells; Multiple myeloma; Plasma cells; Stem cell collection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29481870     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  4 in total

1.  Blood monitoring of circulating tumor plasma cells by next generation flow in multiple myeloma after therapy.

Authors:  Luzalba Sanoja-Flores; Juan Flores-Montero; Noemi Puig; Teresa Contreras-Sanfeliciano; Roberia Pontes; Alba Corral-Mateos; Omar García-Sánchez; María Díez-Campelo; Roberto José Pessoa de Magalhães; Luis García-Martín; José María Alonso-Alonso; Aranzazú García-Mateo; Carlos Aguilar-Franco; Jorge Labrador; Abelardo Barez-García; Angelo Maiolino; Bruno Paiva; Jesús San Miguel; Elaine Sobral da Costa; Marcos González; María Victoria Mateos; Brian Durie; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Transcriptional profiling of circulating tumor cells in multiple myeloma: a new model to understand disease dissemination.

Authors:  Juan-Jose Garcés; Michal Simicek; Marco Vicari; Lucie Brozova; Leire Burgos; Renata Bezdekova; Diego Alignani; Maria-Jose Calasanz; Katerina Growkova; Ibai Goicoechea; Xabier Agirre; Ludek Pour; Felipe Prosper; Rafael Rios; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Pamela Millacoy; Luis Palomera; Rafael Del Orbe; Albert Perez-Montaña; Sonia Garate; Laura Blanco; Marta Lasa; Patricia Maiso; Juan Flores-Montero; Luzalba Sanoja-Flores; Zuzana Chyra; Alexander Vdovin; Tereza Sevcikova; Tomas Jelinek; Cirino Botta; Halima El Omri; Jonathan Keats; Alberto Orfao; Roman Hajek; Jesus F San-Miguel; Bruno Paiva
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Is Quantification of Measurable Clonal Plasma Cells in Stem Cell Grafts (gMRD) Clinically Meaningful?

Authors:  Guldane Cengiz Seval; Meral Beksac
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Plasma Cell Leukemia: Definition, Presentation, and Treatment.

Authors:  Michael Tveden Gundesen; Thomas Lund; Hanne E H Moeller; Niels Abildgaard
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.