| Literature DB >> 29480799 |
Xiangyu Wang1, Jim Jinn-Chyuan Sheu2, Ming-Tsung Lai3, Cherry Yin-Yi Chang4, Xiugui Sheng5, Ling Wei5, Yongsheng Gao5, Xingwu Wang5, Naifu Liu5, Wenli Xie6, Chih-Mei Chen7, Wendy Y Ding7, Li Sun5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Remodeling spacing factor 1 (RSF-1/HBXAP) has been linked to a variety of cancer types, however, its roles and the therapeutic potential are not clear in cervical cancer.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29480799 PMCID: PMC5825929 DOI: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) ISSN: 2211-8020
Summary of clinical characteristics of the study cohort.
| Variable | Total no. of patients | |
|---|---|---|
| 51±10.6 | ||
| ≤ 32 | 9 | 4.09% |
| 33-50 | 91 | 41.36% |
| ≥ 51 | 120 | 54.55% |
| 20 | ||
| 40 | ||
| CIN I | 5 | 12.50% |
| CIN II | 14 | 35.00% |
| CIN III | 21 | 52.50% |
| 160 | ||
| Tumor size(cm) | 160 | |
| ≤4 | 90 | 56.25% |
| >4 | 70 | 43.75% |
| FIGO stage | 160 | |
| I | 10 | 6.25% |
| II | 42 | 26.25% |
| III | 55 | 34.38% |
| IV | 53 | 33.12% |
| Histological grade | 160 | |
| Well differentiated | 43 | 26.88% |
| Moderately differentiated | 44 | 27.50% |
| Poorly differentiated | 73 | 45.62% |
Statistical significance. (*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001)
Fig. 1RSF-1 expression in different cervical tissues. (a) RSF-1 staining was performed and scored on different cervical tissues. Representative staining images for normal tissues, CINs and cervical carcinomas were presented. (b) RSF-1 strongly-positive staining is more frequent in carcinomas and CINs than in normal.
Distribution of RSF-1 status in human cervical cancer according to clinicopathological characteristics.
| Characteristics | Number | RSF-1 over-expression (n = 86) | Negative/weak RSF-1 expression (n = 76) | P values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤51 | 74 | 39 | 35 | |
| >51 | 88 | 47 | 41 | |
| <4 | 81 | 33 | 48 | |
| ≥4 | 81 | 53 | 28 | |
| poorly differentiated | 75 | 48 | 27 | |
| moderately and well differentiated | 87 | 38 | 49 | |
| Positive | 83 | 56 | 27 | |
| Negative | 79 | 30 | 49 | |
| IA-IIA | 90 | 35 | 55 | |
| IIB-IV | 72 | 52 | 21 |
Statistical significance (*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001)
Fig. 2RSF-1 expression correlates with poor clinical outcomes. (a) Samples with high RSF-1 expression (staining scores of 9+ to 12+) tends to be associated with bigger tumor sizes, poor differentiation, nodal metastasis and more advanced stages. (b) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a shorter overall survival for patients with high RSF-1 expression.
Fig. 3Impacts of RSF-1 knockdown by specific siRNA. (a) RSF-1 levels in HeLa and SiHa cells were detected by QPCR (left) and Western blotting (right) using 293-T cells as the control. (b) RSF-1knockdown efficiency was verified by Western blotting. RSF-1 knockdown (c) reduced cell growth and (d) increased paclitaxel sensitivity in HeLa cells.
Fig. 4Functional impacts of the dominant negative RSF-1 (RSF-D4). (a) Western blotting was performed to detect RSF-D4 expression in HeLa cells. Cells transfected with empty vectors were used as the negative control. RSF-1 functional knockdown by RSF-D4 (b) reduced cell growth and (c) increased paclitaxel sensitivity in HeLa cells.