Literature DB >> 29480621

The medically compromised patient: Are dental implants a feasible option?

A Vissink1, Fkl Spijkervet1, G M Raghoebar1.   

Abstract

In healthy subjects, dental implants have evolved to be a common therapy to solve problems related to stability and retention of dentures as well as to replace failing teeth. Although dental implants are applied in medically compromised patients, it is often not well known whether this therapy is also feasible in these patients, whether the risk of implant failure and developing peri-implantitis is increased, and what specific preventive measures, if any, have to be taken when applying dental implants in these patients. Generally speaking, as was the conclusion by the leading review of Diz, Scully, and Sanz on placement of dental implants in medically compromised patients (J Dent, 41, 2013, 195), in a few disorders implant survival may be lower, and the risk of a compromised peri-implant health and its related complications be greater, but the degree of systemic disease control outweighs the nature of the disorder rather than the risk accompanying dental implant treatment. So, as dental implant treatment is accompanied by significant functional benefits and improved oral health-related quality of life, dental implant therapy is a feasible treatment in almost any medically compromised patient when the required preventive measures are taken and follow-up care is at a high level.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autoimmune disorders; dental implants; head and neck radiotherapy; mucosal diseases; osteoporosis; peri-implant health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29480621     DOI: 10.1111/odi.12762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  7 in total

1.  Retention Capacity of Original Denture Adhesives and White Brands for Conventional Complete Dentures: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Joana Mendes; José Manuel Mendes; Pedro Barreiros; Carlos Aroso; António Sérgio Silva
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Assessment of failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients.

Authors:  Anuj Singh Parihar; Sudha Madhuri; Raghu Devanna; Geeta Sharma; Rohit Singh; Kaushik Shetty
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

3.  Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws triggered by dental implants placement: A case report.

Authors:  Jorge Toledano-Serrabona; Gabriela Párraga-Manzol; Mª Ángeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-01-01

4.  Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sara Hussain Alhammadi; Girvan Burnside; Alexander Milosevic
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Cross-kingdom microbial interactions in dental implant-related infections: is Candida albicans a new villain?

Authors:  João G S Souza; Raphael C Costa; Aline A Sampaio; Victória L Abdo; Bruna E Nagay; Nidia Castro; Belén Retamal-Valdes; Jamil A Shibli; Magda Feres; Valentim A R Barão; Martinna Bertolini
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Survival Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Implant Overdentures in Old and Medically Compromised Patients.

Authors:  So-Hyun Kim; Nam-Sik Oh; Hyo-Jung Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  A Systematic Analysis of the Available Human Clinical Studies of Dental Implant Failure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Andrada Voina-Tonea; Anca Labunet; Adriana Objelean; Florin Onisor; Simion Bran; Alexandru Mester; Andra Piciu; Sorina Sava
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.