| Literature DB >> 29480458 |
Jing Ding1,2, Qin Han3, Mou Deng1, Xiao-Chen Song1, Chun Chen1, Fang-Fang Ai1, Lan Zhu4,5, Robert Chun-Hua Zhao6,7,8.
Abstract
HUMSCs were isolated, differentiated and characterized in vitro. Both HUMSCs and smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs were used to fabricate tissue-engineered fascia equivalents. Forty-eight mature female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups: group A (GynemeshTMPS, n = 12), group B (GynemeshTMPS + HUMSCs; n = 12), group C (GynemeshTMPS + smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs; n = 12) and group D (GynemeshTMPS + HUMSCs + smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs; n = 12). The posterior vaginal wall was incised from the introitus and the mesh was then implanted. Three implants of each type were tested at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Fibrotic remodeling, inflammation, vascularization and tissue regeneration were histologically assessed. The levels of type I and type III collagen were determined. There was no difference in fibrotic remodeling between cell-seeded and unseeded meshes at any time (p > 0.05). At 12 weeks, there did not appear to be fewer inflammatory cells around the filament bundles in the mesh with cells compared with the mesh alone (P > 0.05). Group D showed a trend toward better vascularization at 12 weeks compared with group A (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after implantation, a thin layer of new tissue growth covered the unseeded scaffold and a thicker layer covered the cell-seeded scaffold (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the ratio of collagen type I/III could be detected among the different groups after 12 weeks (P > 0.05). HUMSCs with differentiated smooth muscle cells might have a potential role in fascia tissue engineering to repair POP in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells; Pelvic floor reconstruction; Polypropylene; Smooth muscle cells; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29480458 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-017-2781-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Tissue Res ISSN: 0302-766X Impact factor: 5.249