Literature DB >> 29480072

Whole-exome sequencing improves genetic testing accuracy in pulmonary artery hypertension.

Xiaofang Zeng1, Tianyu Lian2, Jianhui Lin3, Suqi Li2, Haikuo Zheng4, Chunyan Cheng2, Jue Ye2, Zhicheng Jing2, Xiaojian Wang2, Wei Huang1.   

Abstract

Sanger sequencing, the traditional "gold standard" for mutation detection, has been wildly used in genetic testing of pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH). However, with the advent of whole-exome sequencing (WES), few studies have compared the accuracy of WES and Sanger sequencing in routine genetic testing of PAH. PAH individuals were enrolled from Fu Wai Hospital and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. WES was used to analyze DNA samples from 120 PAH patients whose bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) mutation statuses had been previously studied using Sanger sequencing. The Sanger sequencing and WES agreement was 98.3% (118/120) with near-perfect agreement (κ coefficient = 0.848). There was no significant difference between the two methods on the McNemar-Bowker test ( P > 0.05). Twenty-one BMPR2 mutation carriers and 99 non-carriers were detected by Sanger sequencing. Among the 21 BMPR2 carriers detected by Sanger sequencing, one variant (c.1040 T > A) was not found by WES. Among the 99 BMPR2 non-carriers, WES detected an extra mutation carrier (c.76 + 1 G > C) missed by Sanger sequencing. Both false-positive and false-negative results were highly conserved and were re-analyzed by Sanger sequencing. WES improved the accuracy of Sanger sequencing and detected 1% (1/99) false-positive and 4.8% (1/21) false-negative results of Sanger sequencing. No false-positive and false-negative results of WES were identified in our analysis. WES is non-inferior to Sanger sequencing and may play a more important role in genetic testing of PAH patients in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sanger sequencing; genetic testing; pulmonary artery hypertension; whole-exome sequencing

Year:  2018        PMID: 29480072      PMCID: PMC5858635          DOI: 10.1177/2045894018763682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Circ        ISSN: 2045-8932            Impact factor:   3.017


  38 in total

1.  Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.

Authors:  N E Hawass
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  What can exome sequencing do for you?

Authors:  Jacek Majewski; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Emilie Lalonde; Alexandre Montpetit; Nada Jabado
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  A novel channelopathy in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Lijiang Ma; Danilo Roman-Campos; Eric D Austin; Mélanie Eyries; Kevin S Sampson; Florent Soubrier; Marine Germain; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Alain Borczuk; Erika Berman Rosenzweig; Barbara Girerd; David Montani; Marc Humbert; James E Loyd; Robert S Kass; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2.

Authors:  Ivan Adzhubei; Daniel M Jordan; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01

Review 5.  Genetics and genomics of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Florent Soubrier; Wendy K Chung; Rajiv Machado; Ekkehard Grünig; Micheala Aldred; Mark Geraci; James E Loyd; C Gregory Elliott; Richard C Trembath; John H Newman; Marc Humbert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing.

Authors:  Yuan Xue; Arunkanth Ankala; William R Wilcox; Madhuri R Hegde
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data.

Authors:  Niklas Krumm; Peter H Sudmant; Arthur Ko; Brian J O'Roak; Maika Malig; Bradley P Coe; Aaron R Quinlan; Deborah A Nickerson; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Rick Kamps; Rita D Brandão; Bianca J van den Bosch; Aimee D C Paulussen; Sofia Xanthoulea; Marinus J Blok; Andrea Romano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  BMPR2 mutations and survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan D W Evans; Barbara Girerd; David Montani; Xiao-Jian Wang; Nazzareno Galiè; Eric D Austin; Greg Elliott; Koichiro Asano; Ekkehard Grünig; Yi Yan; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Alessandra Manes; Massimiliano Palazzini; Lisa A Wheeler; Ikue Nakayama; Toru Satoh; Christina Eichstaedt; Katrin Hinderhofer; Matthias Wolf; Erika B Rosenzweig; Wendy K Chung; Florent Soubrier; Gérald Simonneau; Olivier Sitbon; Stefan Gräf; Stephen Kaptoge; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Marc Humbert; Nicholas W Morrell
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 30.700

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid disease progress in a PVOD patient carrying a novel EIF2AK4 mutation: a case report.

Authors:  Xiaofang Zeng; Fan Chen; Anandharajan Rathinasabapathy; Tangzhiming Li; Agila Adnan Ali Mohammed Mohammed; Zaixin Yu
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.317

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.