Cynthia Z Burton1,2, Lea Vella1,3, Elizabeth W Twamley1,4. 1. a Department of Psychiatry , University of California , San Diego , CA , USA. 2. b Department of Psychiatry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA. 3. c Geriatrics Service , San Francisco VA Health Care System , San Francisco , CA , USA. 4. d VA San Diego Healthcare System , Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health , San Diego , CA , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prospective memory (the ability to remember to do things) has clear implications for everyday functioning, including employment, in people with severe mental illnesses (SMI). This study aimed to evaluate prospective memory performance and its relationship to real-world functional variables in an employment-seeking sample of people with SMI (Clinical Trial registration number NCT00895258). METHOD: 153 individuals with DSM-IV diagnosis of depression (n = 58), bipolar disorder (n = 37), or schizophrenia (n = 58) who were receiving outpatient psychiatric care at a university clinic enrolled in a trial of supported employment and completed a baseline assessment. Prospective memory was measured with the Memory for Intentions Test (MIST); real-world functional status included work history variables, clinical history variables, baseline functional capacity (UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief), and work outcomes (weeks worked and wages earned during two years of supported employment). RESULTS: Participants with schizophrenia performed worse on the MIST than did those with affective disorders. Independent of diagnosis, education, and estimated intellectual functioning, prospective memory significantly predicted variance in measures of disability and illness burden (disability benefits, hospitalization history, current functional capacity), and work outcomes over two years of supported employment (weeks worked). CONCLUSIONS: Worse prospective memory appears to be associated with greater illness burden and functional disability in SMI. Mental health clinicians and employment specialists may counsel clients to use compensatory prospective memory strategies to improve work performance and decrease functional disability associated with SMI.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective memory (the ability to remember to do things) has clear implications for everyday functioning, including employment, in people with severe mental illnesses (SMI). This study aimed to evaluate prospective memory performance and its relationship to real-world functional variables in an employment-seeking sample of people with SMI (Clinical Trial registration number NCT00895258). METHOD: 153 individuals with DSM-IV diagnosis of depression (n = 58), bipolar disorder (n = 37), or schizophrenia (n = 58) who were receiving outpatientpsychiatric care at a university clinic enrolled in a trial of supported employment and completed a baseline assessment. Prospective memory was measured with the Memory for Intentions Test (MIST); real-world functional status included work history variables, clinical history variables, baseline functional capacity (UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief), and work outcomes (weeks worked and wages earned during two years of supported employment). RESULTS:Participants with schizophrenia performed worse on the MIST than did those with affective disorders. Independent of diagnosis, education, and estimated intellectual functioning, prospective memory significantly predicted variance in measures of disability and illness burden (disability benefits, hospitalization history, current functional capacity), and work outcomes over two years of supported employment (weeks worked). CONCLUSIONS: Worse prospective memory appears to be associated with greater illness burden and functional disability in SMI. Mental health clinicians and employment specialists may counsel clients to use compensatory prospective memory strategies to improve work performance and decrease functional disability associated with SMI.
Authors: Raymond W C Au; David Man; Yu-Tao Xiang; David Shum; Edwin Lee; Gabor S Ungvari; Wai-Kwong Tang Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Elizabeth W Twamley; Kelsey R Thomas; Cynthia Z Burton; Lea Vella; Dilip V Jeste; Robert K Heaton; Susan R McGurk Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Raymond W C Au; Gabor S Ungvari; Edwin Lee; David Man; David H K Shum; Yu-Tao Xiang; Wai-Kwong Tang Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Raymond W C Au; Yu-Tao Xiang; Gabor S Ungvari; Edwin Lee; David H K Shum; David Man; Wai-Kwong Tang Journal: Perspect Psychiatr Care Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.186
Authors: Sarah A Raskin; Jacqueline Maye; Alexandra Rogers; David Correll; Marta Zamroziewicz; Matthew Kurtz Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Elizabeth W Twamley; Steven Paul Woods; Cynthia H Zurhellen; Mary Vertinski; Jenille M Narvaez; Brent T Mausbach; Thomas L Patterson; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Brent T Mausbach; Phillip D Harvey; Sherry R Goldman; Dilip V Jeste; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Zanjbeel Mahmood; Amber V Keller; Cynthia Z Burton; Lea Vella; Georg E Matt; Susan R McGurk; Elizabeth W Twamley Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 3.084