| Literature DB >> 29480040 |
Olivia Kiwanuka1, Bo-Michael Bellander1, Anders Hånell1.
Abstract
When evaluating the design of pre-clinical studies in the field of traumatic brain injury, we found substantial differences compared to phase III clinical trials, which in part may explain the difficulties in translating promising experimental drugs into approved treatments. By using network analysis, we also found cases where a large proportion of the studies evaluating a pre-clinical treatment was performed by inter-related researchers, which is potentially problematic. Subjecting all pre-clinical trials to the rigor of a phase III clinical trial is, however, likely not practically achievable. Instead, we repeat the call for a distinction to be made between exploratory and confirmatory pre-clinical studies.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental design; network analysis; systematic reviews; translational research; traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29480040 PMCID: PMC5987941 DOI: 10.1177/0271678X18760109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab ISSN: 0271-678X Impact factor: 6.200