Literature DB >> 29479115

Examination of radio-opacity enhancing additives in shape memory polyurethane foams.

Andrew C Weems1, Jeffery E Raymond2, Kevin T Wacker3,4,5, Tiffany P Gustafson2, Brandis Keller1, Karen L Wooley2,3,4,5, Duncan J Maitland1.   

Abstract

Three microparticle additives, tungsten (W), zirconium oxide (ZrO2), and barium sulfate (BaSO4) were selected to enhance the radio-opacity in shape memory polymer (SMP) foam biomaterials. The addition of filler causes no significant alterations of glass transition temperatures, density of the materials increases, pore diameter decreases, and total volume recovery decreases from approximately 70 times in unfilled foams to 20 times (4% W and 10% ZrO2). The addition of W increases time to recovery; ZrO2 causes little variation in time to shape recovery; BaSO4 increases the time to recovery. On a 2.00 mean X-ray density (mean X.D.) scale, a GDC coil standard has a mean X.D. of 0.62; 4% W enhances the mean X.D. to 1.89, 10% ZrO2 to 1.39 and 4% BaSO4 to 0.74. Radio-opacity enhancing additives could be used to produce SMP foams with controlled shape memory kinetics, low density, and enhanced X-ray opacity for medical materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray; biomaterials; foams; polyurethanes; stimuli-sensitive polymers

Year:  2015        PMID: 29479115      PMCID: PMC5823705          DOI: 10.1002/APP.42054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci        ISSN: 0021-8995            Impact factor:   3.125


  33 in total

1.  Degradation of tungsten coils implanted into the subclavian artery of New Zealand white rabbits is not associated with local or systemic toxicity.

Authors:  Matthias Peuster; Christoph Fink; Peter Wohlsein; Michael Bruegmann; Alexander Günther; Volker Kaese; Matthias Niemeyer; Heinz Haferkamp; Christian v Schnakenburg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends.

Authors:  J Robert Kelly
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04

3.  Hemocompatibility of high strength oxide ceramic materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Horst Fischer; Maria Luk; Bernward Oedekoven; Rainer Telle; Khosrow Mottaghy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  In vivo response to an implanted shape memory polyurethane foam in a porcine aneurysm model.

Authors:  Jennifer N Rodriguez; Fred J Clubb; Thomas S Wilson; Matthew W Miller; Theresa W Fossum; Jonathan Hartman; Egemen Tuzun; Pooja Singhal; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 5.  Tungsten toxicity.

Authors:  Mark L Witten; Paul R Sheppard; Brandon L Witten
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.192

6.  Cold hibernated elastic memory foams for endovascular interventions.

Authors:  Annick Metcalfe; Anne-Cécile Desfaits; Igor Salazkin; L'Hocine Yahia; Witold M Sokolowski; Jean Raymond
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Biocompatibility of a new radiopaque iodine-containing acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  Catharina S J van Hooy-Corstjens; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Menno L W Knetsch; Piet Geusens; Roel Kuijer; Leo H Koole
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  The role of polymer surface degradation and barium sulphate release in the pathogenesis of catheter-related infection.

Authors:  Francis Verbeke; Ulrike Haug; Annemieke Dhondt; Werner Beck; Andrea Schnell; Ruth Dietrich; Reinhold Deppisch; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Effect of molecular structure of poly(glycidyl ether) reagents on crosslinking and mechanical properties of bovine pericardial xenograft materials.

Authors:  J M Lee; C A Pereira; L W Kan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-09

Review 10.  Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial.

Authors:  C Piconi; G Maccauro
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  7 in total

1.  Revealing the glass transition in shape memory polymers using Brillouin spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zachary A Steelman; Andrew C Weems; Andrew J Traverso; Jason M Szafron; Duncan J Maitland; Vladislav V Yakovlev
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Improved Oxidative Biostability of Porous Shape Memory Polymers by Substituting Triethanolamine for Glycerol.

Authors:  Andrew C Weems; Kevin T Wacker; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.125

3.  Shape memory polymers with visible and near-infrared imaging modalities: Synthesis, characterization and in vitro analysis.

Authors:  A C Weems; J E Raymond; A D Easley; M A Wierzbicki; T Gustafson; Mbb Monroe; D J Maitland
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Two-year performance study of porous, thermoset, shape memory polyurethanes intended for vascular medical devices.

Authors:  Andrew C Weems; Anthony J Boyle; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  Smart Mater Struct       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.585

5.  Chemical Modifications of Porous Shape Memory Polymers for Enhanced X-ray and MRI Visibility.

Authors:  Grace K Fletcher; Landon D Nash; Lance M Graul; Lindy K Jang; Scott M Herting; Matthew D Wilcox; Tyler J Touchet; Ana Katarina Sweatt; Mary P McDougall; Steven M Wright; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Sophie Wendels; Luc Avérous
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-10-15

7.  Highly biodegradable, thermostable eutectogels prepared by gelation of natural deep eutectic solvents using xanthan gum: preparation and characterization.

Authors:  Chaoxi Zeng; Haiyang Zhao; Zheng Wan; Qian Xiao; Huiping Xia; Shiyin Guo
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.036

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.