Literature DB >> 29478878

A case-vignette based assessment of patient's perspective on coronary revascularization strategies, the OPINION study.

Kaneshka Masdjedi1, Joost Daemen2, Roberto Diletti2, Jeroen Wilschut2, Elisabeth Utens3, Peter P de Jaegere2, Miguel E Lemmert2, Arie-Pieter Kappetein4, Felix Zijlstra2, Ron van Domburg2, Nicolas M Van Mieghem2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Significant left main (LM) stem disease is potentially life-threatening and mandates revascularization. This study aimed to assess how patients rate the importance of particular features of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), how this determines their preference for a particular treatment strategy, and whether particular personality characteristics influence this preference. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In total, 1145 patients who visited the outpatient clinic of the Erasmus Medical Center for stable coronary artery disease were asked to complete a case vignette-questionnaire on a hypothetical significant LM stenosis amenable to PCI or CABG. To assess the individual's personality disposition and general distress level, each patient had to complete a set of 3 standardized, validated questionnaires with satisfactory psychometric properties. Overall 89% of patients preferred PCI to CABG. PCI was the preferred strategy despite a higher risk for repeat revascularization and need for more medication. Remarkably, the fact that a risk for repeat revascularization is more common in the PCI group is less important for the patients who opt for PCI. Risk for stroke and bleeding were the most important arguments to opt for PCI over CABG. Type D personality, depression, and anxiety were all associated with a relatively higher preference for CABG as revascularization strategy.
CONCLUSION: Overall, when given the choice patients seem to have a clear preference for PCI over CABG and consider stroke and bleeding important procedure-related complications. Patients with Type D personality, depression, or anxiety favor CABG.
Copyright © 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary revascularization; Patient perspective; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Shared decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29478878     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  The Influence of Personality Type D on Cardiovascular Prognosis in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Data from a 5-Year-Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Olga Igorevna Raykh; Alexei Nikolayevich Sumin; Ekaterina Victorovna Korok
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-06

2.  A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial to Assess the Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Design and Rationale of the MICS-CABG PRPP Trial.

Authors:  Yichen Gong; Xiaoxiao Wang; Nan Li; Yuanhao Fu; Hui Zheng; Ye Zheng; Siyan Zhan; Yunpeng Ling
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.