Literature DB >> 29478736

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Low-Prostate-specific Antigen, High-grade Prostate Cancer.

Brandon A Mahal1, David D Yang2, Natalie Q Wang3, Mohammed Alshalalfa3, Elai Davicioni3, Voleak Choeurng3, Edward M Schaeffer4, Ashley E Ross5, Daniel E Spratt6, Robert B Den7, Neil E Martin8, Kent W Mouw8, Peter F Orio8, Toni K Choueiri9, Mary-Ellen Taplin9, Quoc-Dien Trinh10, Felix Y Feng11, Paul L Nguyen12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The consequences of low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in high-grade (Gleason 8-10) prostate cancer are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical implications and genomic features of low-PSA, high-grade disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study of clinical data for 494 793 patients from the National Cancer Data Base and 136 113 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program with cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer (median follow-up 48.9 and 25.0 mo, respectively), and genomic data for 4960 patients from the Decipher Genomic Resource Information Database. Data were collected for 2004-2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable Fine-Gray and Cox regressions were used to analyze prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For Gleason 8-10 disease, using PSA 4.1-10.0ng/ml (n=38 719) as referent, the distribution of PCSM by PSA was U-shaped, with an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of 2.70 for PSA ≤2.5ng/ml (n=3862, p<0.001) versus 1.97, 1.36, and 2.56 for PSA of 2.6-4.0 (n=4199), 10.1-20.0 (n=17 372), and >20.0ng/ml (n=16 114), respectively. By contrast, the distribution of PCSM by PSA was linear for Gleason ≤7 (using PSA 4.1-10.0ng/ml as the referent, n=359 898), with an AHR of 0.41 (p=0.13) for PSA ≤2.5ng/ml (n=37 812) versus 1.38, 2.28, and 4.61 for PSA of 2.6-4.0 (n=54 152), 10.1-20.0 (n=63 319), and >20.0ng/ml (n=35 459), respectively (pinteraction<0.001). Gleason 8-10, PSA ≤2.5ng/ml disease had a significantly higher PCSM than standard high-risk/very high-risk disease with PSA >2.5ng/ml (AHR 2.15, p=0.002; 47-mo PCSM 14% vs 4.9%). Among Gleason 8-10 patients treated with radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy was associated with a survival benefit for PSA >2.5ng/ml (AHR 0.87; p<0.001) but not ≤2.5ng/ml (AHR 1.36; p=0.084; pinteraction=0.021). For Gleason 8-10 tumors, PSA ≤2.5ng/ml was associated with higher expression of neuroendocrine/small-cell markers compared to >2.5ng/ml (p=0.046), with no such relationship for Gleason ≤7 disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-PSA, high-grade prostate cancer has very high risk for PCSM, potentially responds poorly to androgen deprivation therapy, and is associated with neuroendocrine genomic features. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this study, we found that low-prostate-specific antigen, high-grade prostate cancer has a very high risk for prostate cancer death, may not respond well to androgen deprivation therapy, and is associated with neuroendocrine genomic features. These findings suggest that current nomograms and treatment paradigms may need modification.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen deprivation therapy; Genomics; Gleason score; Neuroendocrine; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Small-cell cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29478736      PMCID: PMC6615042          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  The Role of Lineage Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Therapy Resistance.

Authors:  Himisha Beltran; Andrew Hruszkewycz; Howard I Scher; Jeffrey Hildesheim; Jennifer Isaacs; Evan Y Yu; Kathleen Kelly; Daniel Lin; Adam Dicker; Julia Arnold; Toby Hecht; Max Wicha; Rosalie Sears; David Rowley; Richard White; James L Gulley; John Lee; Maria Diaz Meco; Eric J Small; Michael Shen; Karen Knudsen; David W Goodrich; Tamara Lotan; Amina Zoubeidi; Charles L Sawyers; Charles M Rudin; Massimo Loda; Timothy Thompson; Mark A Rubin; Abdul Tawab-Amiri; William Dahut; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Is Androgen Deprivation Therapy "Another Deficient Therapy" for Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Ryan M Phillips; Michael Haffner; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Cancer-Specific Survival and Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Zhang; Chenghao Zhanghuang; Jinkui Wang; Xiaomao Tian; Xin Wu; Maoxian Li; Tao Mi; Jiayan Liu; Liming Jin; Mujie Li; Dawei He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Identification and Validation of the Prognostic Impact of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Phenotypes.

Authors:  Shelby A Labe; Xi Wang; Eric J Lehrer; Amar U Kishan; Daniel E Spratt; Christine Lin; Alicia K Morgans; Lee Ponsky; Jorge A Garcia; Sara Garrett; Ming Wang; Nicholas G Zaorsky
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.121

5.  Association of Increased Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Treatment and Mortality in Men With Locally Advanced vs Localized Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Martin T King; Ming-Hui Chen; Laurence Collette; Anouk Neven; Michel Bolla; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Prognostic Significance of Serum PSA Level and Telomerase, VEGF and GLUT-1 Protein Expression for the Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anna Gasinska; Janusz Jaszczynski; Urszula Rychlik; Elżbieta Łuczynska; Marek Pogodzinski; Mikolaj Palaczynski
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 7.  Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET?

Authors:  Ramin Alipour; Arun Azad; Michael S Hofman
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Immunoreactivity for prostate specific antigen and Ki67 differentiates subgroups of prostate cancer related to outcome.

Authors:  Peter Hammarsten; Andreas Josefsson; Elin Thysell; Marie Lundholm; Christina Hägglöf; Diego Iglesias-Gato; Amilcar Flores-Morales; Pär Stattin; Lars Egevad; Torvald Granfors; Pernilla Wikström; Anders Bergh
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Inferior Cancer Survival for Men with Localized High-grade Prostate Cancer but Low Prostate-specific Antigen.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Kathryn L Penney; Amparo G Gonzalez-Feliciano; Noel W Clarke; Thomas Hermanns; Konrad H Stopsack; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Massimo Loda; Brandon Mahal; Travis A Gerke; Mark A Preston; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Therapy considerations in neuroendocrine prostate cancer: what next?

Authors:  Himisha Beltran; Francesca Demichelis
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.