Marc P Dotson1, Mark L Gustafson2, Alfred Tager2, Leslie M Peterson3. 1. Charleston Area Medical Center Graduate Medical Education, Charleston, WV. Electronic address: mpdotson50@gmail.com. 2. Charleston Area Medical Center Graduate Medical Education, Charleston, WV. 3. HealthNet Aeromedical Services, Charleston, WV.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Simulation training is an integral part of the training of medical personnel. However, there are limited data on the use of simulation in the training of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively compared the number of orientation flights needed to be released to a full crewmember and the cost of training in an air medical flight academy before and after implementation of a high-fidelity air medical simulator. A total of 13 participants in the air medical services flight academy were analyzed. Four of these participants went through the standard academy. Nine participants went through the standard academy but had additional training using the simulator. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the number of orientation flights before release from training (P = .35). Also, although there was a trend that the simulator decreased the overall cost of training, there was no significant difference between the groups (P = .16). CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of a high-fidelity simulator when training HEMS personnel does not significantly reduce the number of orientation flights needed to become a full crewmember. There was a trend toward a significant reduction in the total cost of training.
OBJECTIVE: Simulation training is an integral part of the training of medical personnel. However, there are limited data on the use of simulation in the training of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively compared the number of orientation flights needed to be released to a full crewmember and the cost of training in an air medical flight academy before and after implementation of a high-fidelity air medical simulator. A total of 13 participants in the air medical services flight academy were analyzed. Four of these participants went through the standard academy. Nine participants went through the standard academy but had additional training using the simulator. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the number of orientation flights before release from training (P = .35). Also, although there was a trend that the simulator decreased the overall cost of training, there was no significant difference between the groups (P = .16). CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of a high-fidelity simulator when training HEMS personnel does not significantly reduce the number of orientation flights needed to become a full crewmember. There was a trend toward a significant reduction in the total cost of training.
Authors: Urs Pietsch; Volker Lischke; Stephen J M Sollid; Stephan Prückner; Lorenz Theiler; Robert Greif; Roland Albrecht Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 2.953