Literature DB >> 29478183

Bird on the wire: Landscape planning considering costs and benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines.

Marcello D'Amico1,2, Inês Catry3,4,5, Ricardo C Martins3,4, Fernando Ascensão4,6, Rafael Barrientos4,6, Francisco Moreira3,4.   

Abstract

Power-line grids are increasingly expanding worldwide, as well as their negative impacts on avifauna, namely the direct mortality through collision and electrocution, the reduction of breeding performance, and the barrier effect. On the other hand, some bird species can apparently benefit from the presence of power lines, for example perching for hunting purposes or nesting on electricity towers. In this perspective essay, we reviewed the scientific literature on both costs and benefits for avifauna coexisting with power lines. Overall, we detected a generalized lack of studies focusing on these costs or benefits at a population level. We suggest that a switch in research approach to a larger spatio-temporal scale would greatly improve our knowledge about the actual effects of power lines on bird populations. This research approach would facilitate suitable landscape planning encompassing both mitigation of costs and promotion of benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines. For example, the strategic route planning of electricity infrastructures would limit collision risk or barrier effects for threatened bird populations. Concurrently, this strategic route planning would promote the range expansion of threatened populations of other bird species, by providing nesting structures in treeless but potentially suitable landscapes. We suggest establishing a collaborative dialogue among the scientific community, governments, and electricity companies, with the aim to produce a win-win scenario in which both biodiversity conservation and infrastructure development are integrated in a common strategy.

Keywords:  Barrier effect; Collision; Electrocution; Nesting platforms; Route planning; Win–win scenario

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29478183      PMCID: PMC6131133          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1025-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  11 in total

1.  Pigeon homing along highways and exits.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Lipp; Alexei L Vyssotski; David P Wolfer; Sophie Renaudineau; Maria Savini; Gerhard Tröster; Giacomo Dell'Omo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Collision effects of wind-power generators and other obstacles on birds.

Authors:  Allan L Drewitt; Rowena H W Langston
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of marked wire in reducing avian collisions with power lines.

Authors:  Rafael Barrientos; Juan Carlos Alonso; Carlos Ponce; Carlos Palacín
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Development of chicken embryos in a pulsed magnetic field.

Authors:  E Berman; L Chacon; D House; B A Koch; W E Koch; J Leal; S Løvtrup; E Mantiply; A H Martin; G I Martucci
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 5.  The effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines on avian reproductive biology and physiology: a review.

Authors:  Kim J Fernie; S James Reynolds
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Individuality in bird migration: routes and timing.

Authors:  Yannis Vardanis; Raymond H G Klaassen; Roine Strandberg; Thomas Alerstam
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Collision mortality has no discernible effect on population trends of North American birds.

Authors:  Todd W Arnold; Robert M Zink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality at power lines: a BACI designed study.

Authors:  Rafael Barrientos; Carlos Ponce; Carlos Palacín; Carlos A Martín; Beatriz Martín; Juan Carlos Alonso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nest-building behavior of Monk Parakeets and insights into potential mechanisms for reducing damage to utility poles.

Authors:  Kevin R Burgio; Margaret A Rubega; Diego Sustaita
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Ultraviolet vision and avoidance of power lines in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Nicholas Tyler; Karl-Arne Stokkan; Chris Hogg; Christian Nellemann; Arnt-Inge Vistnes; Glen Jeffery
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.560

View more
  5 in total

1.  Identifying Habitat Elements from Bird Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Zhaojun Wang; Jiangning Wang; Congtian Lin; Yan Han; Zhaosheng Wang; Liqiang Ji
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Beyond BACI: Offsetting carcass numbers with flight intensity to improve risk assessments of bird collisions with power lines.

Authors:  Moritz Mercker; Klaus Jödicke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Individual variability in space use near power lines by a long-lived territorial raptor.

Authors:  Ana Teresa Marques; Luís Palma; Rui Lourenço; Rogério Cangarato; Alexandre Leitão; Miguel Mascarenhas; João Tiago Tavares; Ricardo Tomé; Francisco Moreira; Pedro Beja
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Response of vertebrate scavengers to power line and road rights-of-way and its implications for bird fatality estimates.

Authors:  Joana Bernardino; Regina Bispo; Ricardo C Martins; Sara Santos; Francisco Moreira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Determination of nest occupation and breeding effect of the white stork by human-mediated landscape in Western Poland.

Authors:  Joanna T Bialas; Łukasz Dylewski; Marcin Tobolka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.