Literature DB >> 29478081

Hybrid MR-PET of brain tumours using amino acid PET and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI.

N A da Silva1, P Lohmann1, J Fairney2,3, A W Magill1,4, A-M Oros Peusquens1, C-H Choi1, R Stirnberg1,5, G Stoffels1, N Galldiks1,6,7, X Golay2,3, K-J Langen1,8,9, N Jon Shah10,11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: PET using radiolabelled amino acids has become a promising tool in the diagnostics of gliomas and brain metastasis. Current research is focused on the evaluation of amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MR imaging for brain tumour imaging. In this hybrid MR-PET study, brain tumours were compared using 3D data derived from APT-CEST MRI and amino acid PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET).
METHODS: Eight patients with gliomas were investigated simultaneously with 18F-FET PET and APT-CEST MRI using a 3-T MR-BrainPET scanner. CEST imaging was based on a steady-state approach using a B1 average power of 1μT. B0 field inhomogeneities were corrected a Prametric images of magnetisation transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and differences to the extrapolated semi-solid magnetisation transfer reference method, APT# and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE#), were calculated. Statistical analysis of the tumour-to-brain ratio of the CEST data was performed against PET data using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS: A tumour-to-brain ratio derived from APT# and 18F-FET presented no significant differences, and no correlation was found between APT# and 18F-FET PET data. The distance between local hot spot APT# and 18F-FET were different (average 20 ± 13 mm, range 4-45 mm).
CONCLUSION: For the first time, CEST images were compared with 18F-FET in a simultaneous MR-PET measurement. Imaging findings derived from18F-FET PET and APT CEST MRI seem to provide different biological information. The validation of these imaging findings by histological confirmation is necessary, ideally using stereotactic biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FET PET; APT; CEST; Glioma; Hybrid MR-PET

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29478081     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3940-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  63 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Understanding quantitative pulsed CEST in the presence of MT.

Authors:  Kimberly L Desmond; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Dual-time-point O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for grading of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Philipp Lohmann; Hans Herzog; Elena Rota Kops; Gabriele Stoffels; Natalie Judov; Christian Filss; Norbert Galldiks; Lutz Tellmann; Carolin Weiss; Michael Sabel; Heinz Hubert Coenen; Nadim Jon Shah; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  In vivo three-dimensional whole-brain pulsed steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Daniel Polders; Jun Hua; He Zhu; Hans J Hoogduin; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter Luijten; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Radiohalogenated nonnatural amino acids as PET and SPECT tumor imaging agents.

Authors:  Jonathan McConathy; Weiping Yu; Nachwa Jarkas; Wonewoo Seo; David M Schuster; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 12.944

6.  Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology.

Authors:  Lutz W Kracht; Hrvoje Miletic; Susanne Busch; Andreas H Jacobs; Jurgen Voges; Moritz Hoevels; Johannes C Klein; Karl Herholz; Wolf-D Heiss
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Assessment of ischemic penumbra in patients with hyperacute stroke using amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Jakob Blicher; Irene Klaerke Mikkelsen; Leif Østergaard; Megan K Strother; Seth A Smith; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Quantitative assessment of amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging with extrapolated semi-solid magnetization transfer reference (EMR) signals: Application to a rat glioma model at 4.7 Tesla.

Authors:  Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Xiaohua Hong; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Influence of blood-brain barrier permeability on O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake in rat gliomas.

Authors:  Carina Stegmayr; Ulrike Bandelow; Dennis Oliveira; Philipp Lohmann; Antje Willuweit; Christian Filss; Norbert Galldiks; Joachim H R Lübke; N Jon Shah; Johannes Ermert; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Nuclear overhauser enhancement mediated chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 Tesla in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Moritz Zaiss; Jan-Eric Meissner; Johannes Windschuh; Benedikt Wiestler; Peter Bachert; Jan Oliver Neumann; Philipp Kickingereder; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Armin Michael Nagel; Sabine Heiland; Mark Edward Ladd; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  CEST MRI provides amide/amine surrogate biomarkers for treatment-naïve glioma sub-typing.

Authors:  Laura Mancini; Stefano Casagranda; Guillaume Gautier; Philippe Peter; Bruno Lopez; Lewis Thorne; Andrew McEvoy; Anna Miserocchi; George Samandouras; Neil Kitchen; Sebastian Brandner; Enrico De Vita; Francisco Torrealdea; Marilena Rega; Benjamin Schmitt; Patrick Liebig; Eser Sanverdi; Xavier Golay; Sotirios Bisdas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis.

Authors:  Philipp Lohmann; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Elena K Bauer; Gabriele Stoffels; Shivakumar Viswanathan; Maximilian I Ruge; Bernd Neumaier; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 3.  Combined Amino Acid Positron Emission Tomography and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Philipp Lohmann; Jan-Michael Werner; N Jon Shah; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Advanced imaging techniques for neuro-oncologic tumor diagnosis, with an emphasis on PET-MRI imaging of malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Wynton B Overcast; Korbin M Davis; Chang Y Ho; Gary D Hutchins; Mark A Green; Brian D Graner; Michael C Veronesi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Hypermetabolism and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity beyond the standard MRI-identified tumor border indicate diffuse glioma extended tissue infiltration.

Authors:  Martina Sebök; Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik; Giovanni Muscas; Athina Pangalu; Katharina Seystahl; Michael Weller; Luca Regli; Jorn Fierstra
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-03-30

6.  Imaging glioma biology: spatial comparison of amino acid PET, amide proton transfer, and perfusion-weighted MRI in newly diagnosed gliomas.

Authors:  S Schön; J Cabello; F Liesche-Starnecker; M Molina-Romero; P Eichinger; M Metz; I Karimov; C Preibisch; J Keupp; A Hock; B Meyer; W Weber; C Zimmer; T Pyka; I Yakushev; J Gempt; B Wiestler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.