Literature DB >> 29477880

Effectiveness of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolts in stunning cattle.

Steffan Edward Octávio Oliveira1, Neville George Gregory2, Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa3, Troy John Gibson2, Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa4, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa3.   

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of penetrating (PCB; 190 psi; N = 363) and non-penetrating captive bolt guns (NPCB; 210-220 psi; N = 92) to stun a total of 455 cattle (Zebu and Zebu Cross). Physical bolt parameters (momentum, kinetic energy and energy density) were evaluated. Clinical indicators of brain function were recorded after stunning (GR), after being hoisted (HO) and at the bleeding rail (BL). Physical bolt parameters (bolt velocity, momentum, kinetic energy, energy density and sectional density) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) for PCB. The need for two or more shots was more frequent for NPCB (210-220 psi; 29% vs. 12%, P < 0.001). Cattle were more likely to collapse at first shot with PCB (190 psi; 99%) compared to NPCB (91%; P < 0.002) which can be attributed to the higher values of bolt physical parameters. Incidence of eyeball rotation (5% vs. 1%) and righting behaviour (7% vs. 1%) were higher (P < 0.001) for NPCB (210-220 psi) at GR than PCB. The NPCB with 210-220 psi had a higher frequency of response to nostril stimulation (2% vs. 0%; P < 0.001) than PCB. Rhythmic respiration was more frequently found for NPCB with 210-220 psi at GR, HO and BL. Therefore, PCB with 190 psi was more effective in ensuring unconsciousness in cattle.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bolt velocity; Cattle slaughter; Rhythmic respiration; Signs of consciousness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477880     DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  2 in total

Review 1.  Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet II: Target selection.

Authors:  Dennis D Will; Terry L Whiting
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  BigBovid- Evaluation of a Newly Developed 9 mm Bullet-Shooting Stunner for Adequate Stunning of Heavy Cattle.

Authors:  Dominic Gascho; Roger Stephan; Clemens Bauer; Michelle Aimée Oesch; Henning Richter
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.