Literature DB >> 29477850

PM2.5 mitigation in China: Socioeconomic determinants of concentrations and differential control policies.

Kui Luo1, Guangdong Li2, Chuanglin Fang3, Siao Sun1.   

Abstract

Elucidating the key impact factors on PM2.5 concentrations is crucial to formulate effective mitigation policies. In this study, we employed an extended Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population Affluence and Technology (STIRPAT) model to identify the socioeconomic determinants of PM2.5 concentrations for 12 different regions and across China. The evaluation was based on a balanced panel dataset integrating long-term satellite-derived PM2.5 concentrations and socio-economic data in China from 1999 to 2011. Empirical results indicate that the influencing factors can be ranked in descending order of importance as: proportion of secondary sector of the economy, GDP per capita, urbanization, population, energy intensity, and proportion of tertiary sector. Proportion of secondary sector is the greatest contribution to increasing PM2.5 concentrations, especially for heavily polluted regions. GDP per capita is secondary in importance, and its impact is weakened by the existence of an EKC relationship between GDP per capita and PM2.5 concentrations. Therefore, PM2.5 pollution is an economic development mode problem, rather than a general economic development problem. The impact of urbanization varies across regions; while promoting urbanization will be conducive to decreased PM2.5 concentrations in Northwest China and Northeast China, it will contribute to increased PM2.5 concentrations in other regions. Population and energy intensity are significant in most regions, but neither are decisive factors because of the small absolute value of their coefficients. Finally, different combinations of mitigation policies are proposed for different regions in this study to meet the mitigation targets.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Differential control policies; Fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)); Satellite remote sensing; Socio-economic determinants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477850     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  Spatio⁻Temporal Relationship and Evolvement of Socioeconomic Factors and PM2.5 in China During 1998⁻2016.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Jie Li; Guobin Zhu; Qiangqiang Yuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Effect of Urban Greening on Incremental PM2.5 Concentration During Peak Hours.

Authors:  Shaogu Wang; Shunqi Cheng; Xinhua Qi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16

3.  The Cause of China's Haze Pollution: City Level Evidence Based on the Extended STIRPAT Model.

Authors:  Jingyuan Li; Jinhua Cheng; Yang Wen; Jingyu Cheng; Zhong Ma; Peiqi Hu; Shurui Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Impact of Coastal Urbanization on Marine Pollution: Evidence from China.

Authors:  Weicheng Xu; Zhendong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Impacts of Industrial Restructuring and Technological Progress on PM2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Fan Zhang; Xin Xuan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Association between urbanisation and the risk of hyperuricaemia among Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS).

Authors:  Xixi Yu; Cheng Zhu; Xiaoqiang Ding; Xiaoyan Zhang; Han Zhang; Ziyan Shen; Jing Chen; Yulu Gu; Shiqi Lv; Di Zhang; Yulin Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.