Literature DB >> 29477844

Comparison of the bone regeneration ability between stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth, human dental pulp stem cells and human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Kengo Nakajima1, Ryo Kunimatsu2, Kazuyo Ando1, Toshinori Ando3, Yoko Hayashi4, Takuya Kihara5, Tomoka Hiraki1, Yuji Tsuka1, Takaharu Abe1, Masato Kaku1, Hiroki Nikawa5, Takashi Takata3, Kazuo Tanne1, Kotaro Tanimoto1.   

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate is the most common congenital anomaly in the orofacial region. Autogenous iliac bone graft, in general, has been employed for closing the bone defect at the alveolar cleft. However, such iliac bone graft provides patients with substantial surgical and psychological invasions. Consequently, development of a less invasive method has been highly anticipated. Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) are a major candidate for playing a significant role in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The aim of this study was to elucidate the nature of bone regeneration by SHED as compared to that of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs). The stems cells derived from pulp tissues and bone marrow were transplanted with a polylactic-coglycolic acid barrier membrane as a scaffold, for use in bone regeneration in an artificial bone defect of 4 mm in diameter in the calvaria of immunodeficient mice. Three-dimensional analysis using micro CT and histological evaluation were performed. Degree of bone regeneration with SHED relative to the bone defect was almost equivalent to that with hDPSCs and hBMSCs 12 weeks after transplantation. The ratio of new bone formation relative to the pre-created bone defect was not significantly different among groups with SHED, hDPSCs and hBMSCs. In addition, as a result of histological evaluation, SHED produced the largest osteoid and widely distributed collagen fibers compared to hDPSCs and hBMSCs groups. Thus, SHED transplantation exerted bone regeneration ability sufficient for the repair of bone defect. The present study has demonstrated that SHED is one of the best candidate as a cell source for the reconstruction of alveolar cleft due to the bone regeneration ability with less surgical invasion.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; Bone regeneration; Dental pulp stem cells; Secondary alveolar bone grafting; Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477844     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  36 in total

Review 1.  Exosomes in perspective: a potential surrogate for stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Ke Ren
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  On-Bone Fixation of Free Gingival Graft Induces an Osteoinductive Effect in Human Alveolar Bone.

Authors:  S S Edranov; N Yu Matveeva; S G Kalinichenko
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 0.804

3.  Comparative analysis of dental pulp stem cells and stem cells from human exfoliated teeth in terms of growth kinetics, immunophenotype, self-renewal and multi lineage differentiation potential for future perspective of calcified tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Shagufta Naz; Farhan Raza Khan; Irfan Khan; Raheela Rahmat Zohra; Asmat Salim; Nuruddin Mohammed; Tashfeen Ahmad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

4.  Potential application of dental stem cells in regenerative reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial tissues: a narrative review.

Authors:  Puhan He; Qunzhou Zhang; Faizan I Motiwala; Rabie M Shanti; Brian M Chang; Anh D Le
Journal:  Front Oral Maxillofac Med       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  Combination of Carbonate Hydroxyapatite and Stem Cells from Human Deciduous Teeth Promotes Bone Regeneration by Enhancing BMP-2, VEGF and CD31 Expression in Immunodeficient Mice.

Authors:  Nurul Aisyah Rizky Putranti; Ryo Kunimatsu; Kodai Rikitake; Tomoka Hiraki; Kengo Nakajima; Takaharu Abe; Yuji Tsuka; Shuzo Sakata; Ayaka Nakatani; Hiroki Nikawa; Kotaro Tanimoto
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 6.  Sinking Our Teeth in Getting Dental Stem Cells to Clinics for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah Hani Shoushrah; Janis Lisa Transfeld; Christian Horst Tonk; Dominik Büchner; Steffen Witzleben; Martin A Sieber; Margit Schulze; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  A narrative overview of utilizing biomaterials to recapitulate the salient regenerative features of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Sevda Pouraghaei Sevari; Sahar Ansari; Alireza Moshaverinia
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.344

8.  The effectiveness of hydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphate incorporated into stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth for reconstruction of rat calvarial bone defects.

Authors:  Alexandre Augusto Ferreira da Silva; Ugo Guilherme Roque Rinco; Ricardo Garcia Mureb Jacob; Vivien Thiemy Sakai; Ronaldo Célio Mariano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Cross-Talk Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Cyril Bouland; Pierre Philippart; Didier Dequanter; Florent Corrillon; Isabelle Loeb; Dominique Bron; Laurence Lagneaux; Nathalie Meuleman
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  Engineered mucoperiosteal scaffold for cleft palate regeneration towards the non-immunogenic transplantation.

Authors:  M I Rizzo; L Tomao; F Locatelli; L Leone; M Zama; S Tedesco; M Cajozzo; M Esposito; C De Stefanis; A M Ferranti; D Mezzogori; A Palmieri; G Pozzato; M Algeri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.