Literature DB >> 29477632

Effect of counseling quality on anxiety, grief, and coping after second-trimester abortion for pregnancy complications.

Jennifer L Kerns1, Biftu Mengesha2, Blair C McNamara3, Arianna Cassidy2, Geffan Pearlson4, Miriam Kuppermann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the relationship between counseling quality, measured by shared decision making and decision satisfaction, and psychological outcomes (anxiety, grief, and posttraumatic stress) after second-trimester abortion for pregnancy complications. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study of women who underwent second-trimester abortion for complications. We recruited participants from Facebook and online support groups and surveyed them about counseling experiences and psychosocial issues. We used multivariate linear regression to evaluate relationships between counseling quality and psychological outcomes.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 145 respondents. Shared decision making and decision satisfaction scores were positively and strongly correlated in bivariate analysis (r=0.7, p<.0001), as were posttraumatic stress and grief scores (r=0.7, p<.0001). In the adjusted analysis, higher decision satisfaction was associated with lower grief and posttraumatic stress scores (p=.02 and p=.01, respectively) and higher shared decision making was associated with lower posttraumatic stress scores (p=.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Decision satisfaction and shared decision making have a positive effect on psychological outcomes after second-trimester abortion for pregnancy complications. Counseling quality may be especially important in this setting given the sensitive nature of decisions regarding pregnancy termination for complications. IMPLICATION: These results highlight the importance of patient-centered counseling for women seeking pregnancy termination.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Counseling quality; Decision satisfaction; Fetal anomalies; Pregnancy termination; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477632     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Kathrine Carstensen; Ida Vogel; Lone Hvidman; Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen; Maja Lanther; Olav Bjørn Petersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Google AdWords and Facebook Ads for Recruitment of Pregnant Women into a Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; Tom H van de Belt; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Robin Hooijer; Sebastian J H Bredie; Nel Roeleveld
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10

3.  Second-trimester abortion attitudes and practices among maternal-fetal medicine and family planning subspecialists.

Authors:  J L Kerns; J K Turk; C M Corbetta-Rastelli; M G Rosenstein; A B Caughey; J E Steinauer
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Abortion Stigma and Its Relationship with Grief, Post-traumatic Stress, and Mental Health-Related Quality of Life After Abortion for Fetal Anomalies.

Authors:  Jennifer Kerns; Morgan Cheeks; Arianna Cassidy; Geffan Pearlson; Biftu Mengesha
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Social media recruitment for mental health research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine Sanchez; Adrienne Grzenda; Andrea Varias; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter; William M McDonald; Charles B Nemeroff; Ned H Kalin; Glenn Martin; Mauricio Tohen; Maria Filippou-Frye; Drew Ramsey; Eleni Linos; Christina Mangurian; Carolyn I Rodriguez
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.735

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.