Literature DB >> 29477390

Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3].

Darius N Lakdawalla1, Jalpa A Doshi2, Louis P Garrison3, Charles E Phelps4, Anirban Basu3, Patricia M Danzon5.   

Abstract

The third section of our Special Task Force report identifies and defines a series of elements that warrant consideration in value assessments of medical technologies. We aim to broaden the view of what constitutes value in health care and to spur new research on incorporating additional elements of value into cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Twelve potential elements of value are considered. Four of them-quality-adjusted life-years, net costs, productivity, and adherence-improving factors-are conventionally included or considered in value assessments. Eight others, which would be more novel in economic assessments, are defined and discussed: reduction in uncertainty, fear of contagion, insurance value, severity of disease, value of hope, real option value, equity, and scientific spillovers. Most of these are theoretically well understood and available for inclusion in value assessments. The two exceptions are equity and scientific spillover effects, which require more theoretical development and consensus. A number of regulatory authorities around the globe have shown interest in some of these novel elements. Augmenting CEA to consider these additional elements would result in a more comprehensive CEA in line with the "impact inventory" of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Possible approaches for valuation and inclusion of these elements include integrating them as part of a net monetary benefit calculation, including elements as attributes in health state descriptions, or using them as criteria in a multicriteria decision analysis. Further research is needed on how best to measure and include them in decision making.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness analysis; economics of medical technology; health technology assessment; value of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477390     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  69 in total

1.  Health technology assessment with risk aversion in health.

Authors:  Darius N Lakdawalla; Charles E Phelps
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Should national pharmacare apply a value-based insurance design?

Authors:  Kai Yeung; Steven G Morgan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Comparative Survival Associated With Use of Targeted vs Nontargeted Therapy in Medicare Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengxiang Li; Jordan Jahnke; Amy R Pettit; Yu-Ning Wong; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-06-05

4.  What Matters Most for Treatment Decisions in Hepatitis C: Effectiveness, Costs, and Altruism.

Authors:  T Joseph Mattingly; Julia F Slejko; Eleanor M Perfetto; Shyamasundaran Kottilil; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Cure at what (systemic) financial cost? Integrating novel therapies into first-line Hodgkin lymphoma treatment.

Authors:  Scott F Huntington
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 6.  The Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Sickle Cell Disease: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Boshen Jiao; Anirban Basu; Joshua Roth; M Bender; Ilsa Rovira; Traci Clemons; Dalyna Quach; Scott Ramsey; Beth Devine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Assessing potential cures: are there distinctive elements of value beyond health gain?

Authors:  Saskia Hendriks; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.744

8.  Partial Personalization of Medical Treatment Decisions: Adverse Effects and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Christopher Weyant; Margaret L Brandeau
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  A New Ethical Framework for Assessing the Unique Challenges of Fetal Therapy Trials.

Authors:  Saskia Hendriks; Christine Grady; David Wasserman; David Wendler; Diana W Bianchi; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathryn E Marqueen; Edward Kim; Celina Ang; Madhu Mazumdar; Michael Buckstein; Bart S Ferket
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.