Literature DB >> 29477347

Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy: A retrospective multicenter study.

Fabia Attili1, Mihai Rimbaş2, Alberto Fantin3, Carlo Fabbri4, Silvia Carrara5, Luca Di Maurizio1, Giulia Gibiino6, Alessandro Repici5, Frediano Inzani7, Antonio Gasbarrini8, Guido Costamagna9, Alberto Larghi10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Procurement of tissue core biopsy may overcome some of the limitations of EUS-FNA. We aimed at assessing the safety, core procurement yield and diagnostic accuracy of two novel available histology needles.
METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with solid lesions who underwent EUS-FNB using the 25G-22G SharkCore™ needles were retrieved from 4 tertiary-care centers database.
RESULTS: 146 patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years; M/F, 76/68) with 156 lesions (114 pancreatic) were identified. In 83 cases the 22G needle was used. 3.6 ± 1.2 passes per lesion were performed, without any major complications. A core biopsy was procured in 89.1% of cases. Considering malignant vs. non-malignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, and diagnostic accuracy were 90.2% (95% CI, 83.7-94.3), 100% (95% CI, 87.2-100), 0.099 (95% CI, 0.058-0.170), 60.4 (95% CI, 3.86-947.4), and 92.3% (95% CI, 88.1-96.5). Procurement yield was significantly higher for the 22G (95.2% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.011), despite the fact that more needle passes were performed with the 25G needle (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 3.4 ± 1.0, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNB using the 25G-22G SharkCore™ needles is able to reach a very good procurement yield and diagnostic accuracy. The 22G-size needle showed superior core procurement and diagnostic capabilities. Large prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the use of these types of needles.
Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle aspiration; Fine needle biopsy; Tissue acquisition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477347     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.01.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Yukitaka Yamashita; Hiroko Akamatsu; Maiko Ikenouchi; Tatsuya Ishii; Hisakazu Matsumoto; Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Yasuki Nakatani; Keiichi Hatamaru; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Akamatsu; Yoshito Uenoyama; Tomohiro Watanabe; Kazuo Ono; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lindsey M Temnykh; Mahmoud A Rahal; Zahra Zia; Mohammad A Al-Haddad
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-04-15

3.  The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; James Weiquan Li; Andrew Boon Eu Kwek; Prem Harichander Thurairajah; Lai Mun Wang
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Accuracy and clinical outcomes of pancreatic EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy in a consecutive series of 852 specimens.

Authors:  Mikkel Marschall Thomsen; Michael Hareskov Larsen; Tina Di Caterino; Gitte Hedegaard Jensen; Michael Bau Mortensen; Sönke Detlefsen
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.275

5.  Comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsies of solid pancreatic and extrapancreatic lesions: a large single-operator experience with a new fine-needle biopsy needle.

Authors:  Abdul Haseeb; Linda Jo Taylor; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.