Literature DB >> 29477314

Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney.

Yu Zhang1, Yue Wu2, Jiuzhi Li3, Guofei Zhang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of lower calyceal calculi with diameter of 2-3 cm in patients with solitary kidney.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 76 cases of calculi in solitary kidney from 3 medical centers in China between April 2013 and October 2016. Among them, 42 cases underwent PCNL, and 34 cases underwent RIRS.
RESULTS: The operation time of the PCNL group (82.0 ± 27.9 minutes) was shorter than the RIRS group (117.2 ± 23.1 min, P <.001). The intraoperative decrease in hemoglobin of the PCNL group was 5.4 ± 2.3 g/L, which was significantly higher than the RIRS group (1.8 ± 0.5 g/L, P <.001). The postoperative hospital stay was 13.9 ± 1.6 days for PCNL, which was longer than the RIRS group (7.3 ± 1.2 days, P < .001). PCNL achieved 85.7% (36 of 42) on 1-session stone-free rate, whereas RIRS group was 58.8% (20 of 34, P = .008). The overall stone-free rates were 92.86% (39 of 42) and 85.29% (29 of 34) for PCNL and RIRS, respectively (P >.05). The postoperative complication rate was similar between the RIRS group and the PCNL group.
CONCLUSION: For patients with solitary kidney, PCNL achieved a higher 1-session stone-free rate than RIRS in the treatment of lower calyceal calculi within 2-3 cm in diameter. However, RIRS, with less bleeding and shorter postoperative hospital stay, may be an alternative.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29477314     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  The feasibility of one-stage flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy in solitary kidney patients with 1-3 cm renal stones and risk factors of renal function changes.

Authors:  Yang Pan; Han Chen; Hualin Chen; Xiaoxiang Jin; Yunxiao Zhu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

2.  Efficacy and safety of fURS in stones larger than 20 mm: is it still the threshold?

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Karagöz; Ismet Bilger Erihan; Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Çağlar Uğurlu; Murat Bağcıoğlu; Mehmet Uslu; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-01-03

3.  A Novel Clinical-Radiomics Model Pre-operatively Predicted the Stone-Free Rate of Flexible Ureteroscopy Strategy in Kidney Stone Patients.

Authors:  Yang Xun; Mingzhen Chen; Ping Liang; Pratik Tripathi; Huchuan Deng; Ziling Zhou; Qingguo Xie; Cong Li; Shaogang Wang; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Ihab Kamel
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-15

4.  Reply to 'Is one-stage f-URS without prior stenting really safe for solitary kidney patients with 1-3 cm renal stones?'

Authors:  Yang Pan; Gang Chen
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.