Ybe Meesters1, Wianne B Duijzer2, Vanja Hommes3. 1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: y.meesters@umcg.nl. 2. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Philips Consumer Lifestyle Drachten, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ever since a new photoreceptor was discovered with a highest sensitivity to 470-490 nm blue light, it has been speculated that blue light has some advantages in the treatment of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) over more traditional treatments. In this study we compared the effects of exposure to narrow-band blue light (BLUE) to those of broad-wavelength white light (BLT) in the treatment of SAD. METHODS: In a 15-day design, 45 patients suffering from SAD completed 30-min sessions of light treatment on 5 consecutive days. 21 subjects received white-light treatment (BLT, broad-wavelength without UV, 10 000 lx, irradiance 31.7 W/m2), 24 subjects received narrow-band blue light (BLUE, 100 lx, irradiance 1.0 W/m2). All participants completed weekly questionnaires concerning mood and energy levels, and were also assessed by means of the SIGH-SAD, which is the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: On day 15, SIGH-SAD ratings were significantly lower than on day 1 (BLT 73.2%, effect size 3.37; BLUE 67%, effect size 2.63), which outcomes were not statistically significant different between both conditions. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Light treatment is an effective treatment for SAD. The use of narrow-band blue light is equally effective as a treatment using bright white-light.
BACKGROUND: Ever since a new photoreceptor was discovered with a highest sensitivity to 470-490 nm blue light, it has been speculated that blue light has some advantages in the treatment of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) over more traditional treatments. In this study we compared the effects of exposure to narrow-band blue light (BLUE) to those of broad-wavelength white light (BLT) in the treatment of SAD. METHODS: In a 15-day design, 45 patients suffering from SAD completed 30-min sessions of light treatment on 5 consecutive days. 21 subjects received white-light treatment (BLT, broad-wavelength without UV, 10 000 lx, irradiance 31.7 W/m2), 24 subjects received narrow-band blue light (BLUE, 100 lx, irradiance 1.0 W/m2). All participants completed weekly questionnaires concerning mood and energy levels, and were also assessed by means of the SIGH-SAD, which is the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: On day 15, SIGH-SAD ratings were significantly lower than on day 1 (BLT 73.2%, effect size 3.37; BLUE 67%, effect size 2.63), which outcomes were not statistically significant different between both conditions. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Light treatment is an effective treatment for SAD. The use of narrow-band blue light is equally effective as a treatment using bright white-light.
Authors: Anne Venner; William D Todd; Jimmy Fraigne; Hannah Bowrey; Ada Eban-Rothschild; Satvinder Kaur; Christelle Anaclet Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: André Do; Victor W Li; Samantha Huang; Erin E Michalak; Edwin M Tam; Trisha Chakrabarty; Lakshmi N Yatham; Raymond W Lam Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 5.321