Literature DB >> 29476982

Atlas selection for hippocampus segmentation: Relevance evaluation of three meta-information parameters.

Vanderson Dill1, Pedro Costa Klein1, Alexandre Rosa Franco2, Márcio Sarroglia Pinho3.   

Abstract

Current state-of-the-art methods for whole and subfield hippocampus segmentation use pre-segmented templates, also known as atlases, in the pre-processing stages. Typically, the input image is registered to the template, which provides prior information for the segmentation process. Using a single standard atlas increases the difficulty in dealing with individuals who have a brain anatomy that is morphologically different from the atlas, especially in older brains. To increase the segmentation precision in these cases, without any manual intervention, multiple atlases can be used. However, registration to many templates leads to a high computational cost. Researchers have proposed to use an atlas pre-selection technique based on meta-information followed by the selection of an atlas based on image similarity. Unfortunately, this method also presents a high computational cost due to the image-similarity process. Thus, it is desirable to pre-select a smaller number of atlases as long as this does not impact on the segmentation quality. To pick out an atlas that provides the best registration, we evaluate the use of three meta-information parameters (medical condition, age range, and gender) to choose the atlas. In this work, 24 atlases were defined and each is based on the combination of the three meta-information parameters. These atlases were used to segment 352 vol from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Hippocampus segmentation with each of these atlases was evaluated and compared to reference segmentations of the hippocampus, which are available from ADNI. The use of atlas selection by meta-information led to a significant gain in the Dice similarity coefficient, which reached 0.68 ± 0.11, compared to 0.62 ± 0.12 when using only the standard MNI152 atlas. Statistical analysis showed that the three meta-information parameters provided a significant improvement in the segmentation accuracy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Atlas-based segmentation; Hippocampus segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Segmentation evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29476982     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  3 in total

1.  Hippocampus Segmentation Using U-Net Convolutional Network from Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Ruhul Amin Hazarika; Arnab Kumar Maji; Raplang Syiem; Samarendra Nath Sur; Debdatta Kandar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Multi-atlas label fusion with random local binary pattern features: Application to hippocampus segmentation.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Zhenyu Tang; Hewei Cheng; Yihong Wu; Yong Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Combined Atlas and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of the Hippocampus from MRI According to the ADNI Harmonized Protocol.

Authors:  Samaneh Nobakht; Morgan Schaeffer; Nils D Forkert; Sean Nestor; Sandra E Black; Philip Barber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.