Literature DB >> 29476900

Patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practise in HIV outpatient care.

Anne Sofie Høgh Kølbæk Kjær1, Thomas Aagaard Rasmussen2, Niels Henrik Hjollund3, Lotte Oerneborg Rodkjaer2, Merete Storgaard2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in outpatient care holds promise as a tool to enhance the quality of care. The management of chronic HIV infection is multidimensional, and clinical assessment includes broad screening to identify complications. With growing constraints on time and resources, the use of PROs may provide a much-needed tool to ensure optimal HIV care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implementation and use of a Web-based tool to collect PROs in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals.
METHODS: In December 2015, the PRO system AmbuFlex, a Web-based tool for self-reporting of clinical symptoms, was implemented in HIV outpatient care at Aarhus University Hospital. The HIV-specific questionnaire was designed to cover items in the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines. Patients responded through a Web-based system from home. Based on an HIV-specific algorithm, responses were automatically assigned a green, yellow, or red colour code reflecting the severity of the symptom. HIV-related data from the electronic hospital management system were used to compare respondents and non-respondents. For cognitive and red symptoms, patient records were accessed to address whether PRO provided new information. Furthermore, it was sought to determine whether implementing PROs in clinical care can help focus the consultation on current needs. This was done by checking if a flagged symptom was assessed clinically at the following consultation.
RESULTS: Five hundred and five HIV patients were invited to participate and 277 (55%) accepted the invitation. Compared to respondents, non-respondents were significantly younger and more often female, born outside Denmark, newly diagnosed, and with a plasma viral load >50 copies/ml. Among the 262 correctly received PRO questionnaires, 104 (39%) had solely green colour-coded responses, whereas 59 (23%) had one or more red colour-coded responses. Of 69 red symptoms, 28 (41%) led to a specific clinical assessment. In many cases, PROs appeared to provide new information on cognitive (76%) and red-coded symptoms (42%).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PROs identified several cases where physical or cognitive symptoms appeared to have been unnoticed. A substantial proportion of patients reported no symptoms requiring medical attention, suggesting a potential to individualize outpatient care and redistribute resource utilization.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision-making; Human immunodeficiency virus; Outpatient care; PRO; Patient-centred care; Patient-reported outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29476900     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility and acceptability of a psychosocial and adherence electronic patient reported outcomes (PROs) system at an HIV care center in southern India.

Authors:  Nishita Sinha; Andrew Yang; Amrose Pradeep; R Bhuvaneswari; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Conall O'Cleirigh; Kenneth H Mayer; Brian T Chan
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2019-09-18

2.  Implementation of an electronic patient-reported measure of barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence with the Opal patient portal: Protocol for a mixed method type 3 hybrid pilot study at a large Montreal HIV clinic.

Authors:  Kim Engler; Serge Vicente; Yuanchao Ma; Tarek Hijal; Joseph Cox; Sara Ahmed; Marina Klein; Sofiane Achiche; Nitika Pant Pai; Alexandra de Pokomandy; Karine Lacombe; Bertrand Lebouché
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Understanding the Risks and Benefits of a Patient Portal Configured for HIV Care: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives.

Authors:  Dominic Chu; David Lessard; Moustafa A Laymouna; Kim Engler; Tibor Schuster; Yuanchao Ma; Nadine Kronfli; Jean-Pierre Routy; Tarek Hijal; Karine Lacombe; Nancy Sheehan; Hayette Rougier; Bertrand Lebouché
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-19

4.  Risk Factors for Suboptimal Adherence Identified by Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessments in Routine HIV Care at 2 North American Clinics.

Authors:  Duncan Short; Xueqi Wang; Shivali Suri; Thomas K Hsu; Bryn Jones; Rob J Fredericksen; Heidi M Crane; Alexandra Musten; Jean Bacon; Yongwei Wang; Kevin A Gough; Moti Ramgopal; Jeff Berry; William B Lober
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Observational Cohort of HIV-1-Infected Adults on Darunavir/Cobicistat-Based Regimens: Beyond Viral Suppression.

Authors:  Andrea Antinori; Maria V Cossu; Barbara Menzaghi; Gaetana Sterrantino; Nicola Squillace; Valentina Di Cristo; Annamaria Cattelan; Emanuele Focà; Antonella Castagna; Giancarlo Orofino; Daniela Valenti; Gabriella D'Ettore; Lucia Aprea; Sergio Ferrara; Maria E Locatelli; Giordano Madeddu; Emanuele Pontali; Paolo Scerbo; Barbara Rossetti; Alessia Uglietti; Roberta Termini; Francesco Rucci; Andrea Gori; Daniela Mancusi
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Liv Marit Valen Schougaard; Annette de Thurah; Jakob Christensen; Kirsten Lomborg; Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl; Jesper Medom Vestergaard; Trine Nøhr Winding; Karin Biering; Niels Henrik Hjollund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.