Literature DB >> 29476537

Secondary transfer effect among children: The role of social dominance orientation and outgroup attitudes.

Loris Vezzali1, Gian Antonio Di Bernardo1, Sofia Stathi2, Alessia Cadamuro1, Barbara Lášticová3, Simona Andraščiková3,4.   

Abstract

Research has provided evidence that the effects of intergroup contact on prejudice reduction are not limited to the outgroup one has contact with (primary outgroup). Rather, they extend to secondary outgroups uninvolved in the contact situation (secondary transfer effect; Pettigrew, 2009, Social Psychology, 40, 55). We aimed to provide the first empirical evidence for the emergence of the secondary transfer effect among children. Majority (Italian) and minority (with an immigrant background) elementary schoolchildren were administered a questionnaire including measures of contact with the primary outgroup (minority children for the majority, majority children for the minority), prejudice towards the primary outgroup and towards a dissimilar secondary outgroup (disabled children), and social dominance orientation. Results revealed that among the majority group, contact with the primary outgroup had indirect associations with reduced prejudice towards the secondary outgroup. Specifically, we found evidence for sequential mediation by social dominance orientation and prejudice towards the primary outgroup. No secondary transfer effects emerged among minority group members. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of the findings, arguing for the importance of identifying the core processes driving the secondary transfer effect.
© 2018 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; intergroup contact; prejudice; secondary transfer effect; social dominance orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29476537     DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  2 in total

1.  How does team diversity relate to the willingness to collaborate with asylum seekers? It depends on the diversity dimensions investigated and boundary conditions.

Authors:  Patrick F Kotzur; Johannes Stricker; Ramona Fricke; Jonathan McPhetres; Bertolt Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  To be or not to be an inclusive teacher: Are empathy and social dominance relevant factors to positive attitudes towards inclusive education?

Authors:  Diego Navarro-Mateu; Jacqueline Franco-Ochoa; Selene Valero-Moreno; Vicente Prado-Gascó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.