Timothy Y Mariano1,2,3, Richard D Urman4,5, Catherine A Hutchison6, Robert N Jamison4,5, Robert R Edwards4,6,5. 1. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. mariano@post.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mariano@post.harvard.edu. 3. Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. mariano@post.harvard.edu. 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major source of physical and psychiatric morbidity and mortality, and the current overreliance on opioid analgesics has contributed to a burgeoning epidemic in the USA. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for CLBP, but little information exists regarding its potential efficacy for CLBP's precursor condition, subacute low back pain (sALBP), defined here as having a 7-12-week duration. Earlier intervention with CBT at the sALBP stage could produce larger clinical benefits. This systematic review was undertaken to characterize and highlight this knowledge gap. RECENT FINDINGS: Of 240 unique articles identified by comprehensive database searches, only six prospective, sALBP-focused, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 20 years met criteria for inclusion in this review. These studies varied widely in their sample sizes, precise definition of sALBP, nature of CBT intervention, and outcome measures. Five of the six showed significant improvements associated with CBT, but the heterogeneity of the studies prevented quantitative comparisons. CBT has not been adequately studied as a potential early intervention treatment for sALBP patients. None of the six identified papers studied US civilians or leveraged innovations such as teletherapy-able to reach patients in remote or underserved areas-underscoring critical gaps in current back pain treatment. Given the severity of the US opioid epidemic, non-pharmacologic options such as CBT should be rigorously explored in the sALBP population.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major source of physical and psychiatric morbidity and mortality, and the current overreliance on opioid analgesics has contributed to a burgeoning epidemic in the USA. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for CLBP, but little information exists regarding its potential efficacy for CLBP's precursor condition, subacute low back pain (sALBP), defined here as having a 7-12-week duration. Earlier intervention with CBT at the sALBP stage could produce larger clinical benefits. This systematic review was undertaken to characterize and highlight this knowledge gap. RECENT FINDINGS: Of 240 unique articles identified by comprehensive database searches, only six prospective, sALBP-focused, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 20 years met criteria for inclusion in this review. These studies varied widely in their sample sizes, precise definition of sALBP, nature of CBT intervention, and outcome measures. Five of the six showed significant improvements associated with CBT, but the heterogeneity of the studies prevented quantitative comparisons. CBT has not been adequately studied as a potential early intervention treatment for sALBP patients. None of the six identified papers studied US civilians or leveraged innovations such as teletherapy-able to reach patients in remote or underserved areas-underscoring critical gaps in current back pain treatment. Given the severity of the US opioid epidemic, non-pharmacologic options such as CBT should be rigorously explored in the sALBP population.
Authors: Kathleen W Saunders; Michael Von Korff; Cynthia I Campbell; Caleb J Banta-Green; Mark D Sullivan; Joseph O Merrill; Constance Weisner Journal: J Pain Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Ellen C Meltzer; Denis Rybin; Richard Saitz; Jeffrey H Samet; Sonia L Schwartz; Stephen F Butler; Jane M Liebschutz Journal: Pain Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Alan D Kaye; Mark R Jones; Adam M Kaye; Juan G Ripoll; Donald E Jones; Vincent Galan; Burton D Beakley; Frank Calixto; Jamie L Bolden; Richard D Urman; Laxmaiah Manchikanti Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Alan D Kaye; Mark R Jones; Adam M Kaye; Juan G Ripoll; Vincent Galan; Burton D Beakley; Frank Calixto; Jamie L Bolden; Richard D Urman; Laxmaiah Manchikanti Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Timothy Y Mariano; Frederick W Burgess; Marguerite Bowker; Jason Kirschner; Mascha Van't Wout-Frank; Richard N Jones; Christopher W Halladay; Michael Stein; Benjamin D Greenberg Journal: Pain Med Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Maisa S Ziadni; Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro; Steven Anderson; Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy; Beth D Darnall Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 5.428