Gwenaelle Gravis1, Jean-Marie Boher2, Yu-Hui Chen3, Glenn Liu4, Karim Fizazi5, Michael A Carducci6, Stephane Oudard7, Florence Joly8, David M Jarrard4, Michel Soulie9, Mario J Eisenberger6, Muriel Habibian10, Robert Dreicer11, Jorge A Garcia12, Maha H M Hussain13, Manish Kohli14, Nicholas J Vogelzang15, Joel Picus16, Robert DiPaola17, Christopher Sweeney18. 1. Centre de Recherche en Cancerologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Electronic address: gravisg@ipc.unicancer.fr. 2. Biostatistic, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Universite, Marseille, France. 3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA. 4. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA. 5. Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France. 6. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. 8. Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France. 9. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France. 10. UNICANCER, Paris, France. 11. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 12. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA. 13. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 14. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 15. Nevada Cancer Research Foundation, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 16. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 17. University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA. 18. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (D) at the time of starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castrate naive prostate cancer shows a clear survival benefit for patients with high-volume (HV) disease. It is unclear whether patients with low-volume (LV) disease benefit from early D. OBJECTIVE: To define the overall survival (OS) of aggregate data of patient subgroups from the CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15 studies, defined by metastatic burden (HV and LV) and time of metastasis occurrence (at diagnosis or after prior local treatment [PRLT]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were accessed from two independent phase III trials of ADT alone or ADT+D-GETUG-AFU15 (N=385) and CHAARTED (N=790), with median follow-ups for survivors of 83.2 and 48.2 mo, respectively. The definition of HV and LV disease was harmonized. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was OS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Meta-analysis results of the aggregate data showed significant heterogeneity in ADT+D versus ADT effect sizes between HV and LV subgroups (p=0.017), and failed to detect heterogeneity in ADT+D versus ADT effect sizes between upfront and PRLT subgroups (p=0.4). Adding D in patients with HV disease has a consistent effect in improving median OS (HV-ADT: 34.4 and 35.1 mo, HV-ADT+D: 51.2 and 39.8 mo in CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15, respectively; pooled average hazard ratio or HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.68 ([95% CI 0.56; 0.82], p<0.001). Patients with LV disease showed much longer OS, without evidence that D improved OS (LV-ADT: not reached [NR] and 83.4; LV-ADT+D: 63.5 and NR in CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15, respectively; pooled HR (95% CI) 1.03 (95% CI 0.77; 1.38). Aggregate data showed no evidence of heterogeneity of early D in LV and HV subgroups irrespective of whether patients had PRLT or not. Post hoc subgroup analysis was based on aggregated data from two independent phase III randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS: There was no apparent survival benefit in the CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15 studies with D for LV. Across both studies, early D showed consistent effect and improved OS in HV patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with a higher burden of metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have a poorer prognosis and are more likely to benefit from early docetaxel. Low-volume patients have longer overall survival with ADT alone, and the toxicity of docetaxel may outweigh its benefits.
BACKGROUND:Docetaxel (D) at the time of starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castrate naive prostate cancer shows a clear survival benefit for patients with high-volume (HV) disease. It is unclear whether patients with low-volume (LV) disease benefit from early D. OBJECTIVE: To define the overall survival (OS) of aggregate data of patient subgroups from the CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15 studies, defined by metastatic burden (HV and LV) and time of metastasis occurrence (at diagnosis or after prior local treatment [PRLT]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were accessed from two independent phase III trials of ADT alone or ADT+D-GETUG-AFU15 (N=385) and CHAARTED (N=790), with median follow-ups for survivors of 83.2 and 48.2 mo, respectively. The definition of HV and LV disease was harmonized. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was OS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Meta-analysis results of the aggregate data showed significant heterogeneity in ADT+D versus ADT effect sizes between HV and LV subgroups (p=0.017), and failed to detect heterogeneity in ADT+D versus ADT effect sizes between upfront and PRLT subgroups (p=0.4). Adding D in patients with HV disease has a consistent effect in improving median OS (HV-ADT: 34.4 and 35.1 mo, HV-ADT+D: 51.2 and 39.8 mo in CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15, respectively; pooled average hazard ratio or HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.68 ([95% CI 0.56; 0.82], p<0.001). Patients with LV disease showed much longer OS, without evidence that D improved OS (LV-ADT: not reached [NR] and 83.4; LV-ADT+D: 63.5 and NR in CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15, respectively; pooled HR (95% CI) 1.03 (95% CI 0.77; 1.38). Aggregate data showed no evidence of heterogeneity of early D in LV and HV subgroups irrespective of whether patients had PRLT or not. Post hoc subgroup analysis was based on aggregated data from two independent phase III randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS: There was no apparent survival benefit in the CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15 studies with D for LV. Across both studies, early D showed consistent effect and improved OS in HV patients. PATIENT SUMMARY:Patients with a higher burden of metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have a poorer prognosis and are more likely to benefit from early docetaxel. Low-volume patients have longer overall survival with ADT alone, and the toxicity of docetaxel may outweigh its benefits.
Authors: Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Ronald de Wit; Peter Mulders; Kim N Chi; Neal D Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Thomas W Flaig; Aude Fléchon; Paul Mainwaring; Mark Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Mohammad Hirmand; Bryan Selby; Lynn Seely; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nicholas D James; Johann S de Bono; Melissa R Spears; Noel W Clarke; Malcolm D Mason; David P Dearnaley; Alastair W S Ritchie; Claire L Amos; Clare Gilson; Rob J Jones; David Matheson; Robin Millman; Gerhardt Attard; Simon Chowdhury; William R Cross; Silke Gillessen; Christopher C Parker; J Martin Russell; Dominik R Berthold; Chris Brawley; Fawzi Adab; San Aung; Alison J Birtle; Jo Bowen; Susannah Brock; Prabir Chakraborti; Catherine Ferguson; Joanna Gale; Emma Gray; Mohan Hingorani; Peter J Hoskin; Jason F Lester; Zafar I Malik; Fiona McKinna; Neil McPhail; Julian Money-Kyrle; Joe O'Sullivan; Omi Parikh; Andrew Protheroe; Angus Robinson; Narayanan N Srihari; Carys Thomas; John Wagstaff; James Wylie; Anjali Zarkar; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M A Eisenberger; B A Blumenstein; E D Crawford; G Miller; D G McLeod; P J Loehrer; G Wilding; K Sears; D J Culkin; I M Thompson; A J Bueschen; B A Lowe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claire L Vale; Sarah Burdett; Larysa H M Rydzewska; Laurence Albiges; Noel W Clarke; David Fisher; Karim Fizazi; Gwenaelle Gravis; Nicholas D James; Malcolm D Mason; Mahesh K B Parmar; Christopher J Sweeney; Matthew R Sydes; Bertrand Tombal; Jayne F Tierney Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Alan I So; Kim N Chi; Brita Danielson; Neil E Fleshner; Anil Kapoor; Tamim Niazi; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Bobby Shayegan; Srikala Sridhar; Eric Vigneault; Fred Saad Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Alan H Bryce; Yu Hui Chen; Glenn Liu; Michael A Carducci; David M Jarrard; Jorge A Garcia; Robert Dreicer; Maha Hussain; Mario Alfredo Eisenberger; Elizabeth R Plimack; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Robert S DiPaola; Lauren Harshman; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2020-08-15
Authors: Philip W Kantoff; Wassim Abida; Konrad H Stopsack; Subhiksha Nandakumar; Andreas G Wibmer; Samuel Haywood; Emily S Weg; Ethan S Barnett; Chloe J Kim; Emily A Carbone; Samantha E Vasselman; Bastien Nguyen; Melanie A Hullings; Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E M Kwan; I A Thangasamy; J Teh; O Alghazo; N J Sathianathen; N Lawrentschuk; A A Azad Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 4.226