Literature DB >> 29475727

Limited mobility of dioxins near San Jacinto super fund site (waste pit) in the Houston Ship Channel, Texas due to strong sediment sorption.

Patrick Louchouarn1, Shaya M Seward2, Gerard Cornelissen3, Hans Peter H Arp4, Kevin M Yeager5, Robin Brinkmeyer6, Peter H Santschi7.   

Abstract

Sediments from a waste pit in Houston Ship Channel (HSC) were characterized using a number of molecular markers of natural organic matter fractions (e.g., pyrogenic carbon residues, PAHs, lignins), in addition to dioxins, in order to test the hypothesis that the dispersal and mobility of dioxins from the waste pit in the San Jacinto River is minimal. Station SG-6, sampled at the site of the submerged waste pit, had the highest dioxin/furan concentrations reported for the Houston Ship Channel/Galveston Bay (HSC/GB) system (10,000-46,000 pg/g), which translated into some of the highest reported World Health Organization Toxic Equivalents (TEQs: 2000-11,000 pg/g) in HSC sediments. Using a multi-tracer approach, this study confirmed our hypothesis that sludges from chlorinated pulps are a very likely source of dioxins/furans to this pit. However, this material also contained large quantities of additional hydrophobic organic contaminants (PAHs) and pyrogenic markers (soot-BC, levoglucosan), pointing to the co-occurrence of petroleum hydrocarbons and combustion byproducts. Comparison of dioxin/furan signatures in the waste pit with those from sediments of the HSC and a control site suggests that the remobilization of contaminated particles did not occur beyond the close vicinity of the pit itself. The dioxins/furans in sediments outside the waste pit within the HSC are rather from other diffuse inputs, entering the sedimentary environment through the air and water, and which are comprised of a mixture of industrial and municipal sources. Fingerprinting of waste pit dioxins indicates that their composition is typical of pulp and paper sources. Measured pore water concentrations were 1 order of magnitude lower than estimated values, calculated from a multiphase sorption model, indicating low mobility of dioxins within the waste pit. This is likely accomplished by co-occurring and strong sorbing pyrogenic and petrogenic residues in the waste pit, which tend to keep dioxins strongly sorbed to particles.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29475727     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  5 in total

1.  Biosensor applications in contaminated estuaries: Implications for disaster research response.

Authors:  Krisa Camargo; Mary Ann Vogelbein; Jennifer A Horney; Timothy M Dellapenna; Anthony H Knap; Jose L Sericano; Terry L Wade; Thomas J McDonald; Weihsueh A Chiu; Michael A Unger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 8.431

2.  Synthesis and evaluation of Fe3O4-impregnated activated carbon for dioxin removal.

Authors:  Yao-Jen Tu; Gnanasiri S Premachandra; Stephen A Boyd; J Brett Sallach; Hui Li; Brian J Teppen; Cliff T Johnston
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 3.  Marine Gel Interactions with Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Pollutants.

Authors:  Peter H Santschi; Wei-Chun Chin; Antonietta Quigg; Chen Xu; Manoj Kamalanathan; Peng Lin; Ruei-Feng Shiu
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 4.  Characterizing baseline legacy chemical contamination in urban estuaries for disaster-research through systematic evidence mapping: A case study.

Authors:  Krisa M Camargo; Margaret Foster; Brian Buckingham; Thomas J McDonald; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 8.943

5.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) cycling and fates in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA.

Authors:  Gilbert T Rowe; Harshica Fernando; Cornelis Elferink; G A Shakeel Ansari; John Sullivan; Thomas Heathman; Antonietta Quigg; Sharon Petronella Croisant; Terry L Wade; Peter H Santschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.