Phillip Sebastian Schulten1, Jan Philip Suppelna1,2, Timoleon Dagres1,2, Günter Noè1, Michael Anapolski1, Joscha Reinhard3, Harald Krentel4, Clemens Tempfer5, Sven Schiermeier1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the recommendations of international guidelines on the use of antepartum and intrapartum cardiotocography.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The guidelines of Germany, Canada, UK, USA, Sri Lanka, Australia as well as FIGO have been compared. The recommendations on the use of cardiotocography were separately evaluated for antepartum and intrapartum use.
RESULTS: Antepartum: In risk-free pregnancies the use of cardiotocography is not recommended in all countries. On the other hand the use of cardiotocography is indicated in the presence of a defined maternal and fetal risk factors. While the NICE guidelines recommend cardiotocography in the case of maternal hypertension, as well as preeclampsia, the German guidelines as well as SOGC list considerably more risk factors. Intrapartually, the recommendations vary greatly from country to country. While German guidelines suggest the use of cardiotocography from late 1st stage of labor, the other countries strongly recommend the auscultation of the fetal heart rate of non-risk pregnancies. This is due to the current study situation, which does not show any advantage of cardiotocography as opposed to intermittent auscultation. Furthermore studies have indicated that the use of cardiotocography caused an increase in iatrogenic induced cesarean sections. In high risk pregnancies the use of cardiotocography is strongly recommended in the compared countries, however there are major differences in the definition of high risk pregnancy and therefore the indication for cardiotocographic monitoring.
CONCLUSION: Intermittent auscultation is a more cost-effective alternative compared to cardiotocography. However, in the case of legal litigation intermittent auscultation is harder to reconstruct the well-being of the newborn during birth. On the other hand cardiotocography might result in a higher cesarean section rate, but can be more helpful to prove fetal well-being during birth for a legal litigation process. Despite the lack of evidence only German guidelines recommend cardiotocographic monitoring from the late 1st stage of labor for risk-free pregnancies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the recommendations of international guidelines on the use of antepartum and intrapartum cardiotocography.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The guidelines of Germany, Canada, UK, USA, Sri Lanka, Australia as well as FIGO have been compared. The recommendations on the use of cardiotocography were separately evaluated for antepartum and intrapartum use.
RESULTS: Antepartum: In risk-free pregnancies the use of cardiotocography is not recommended in all countries. On the other hand the use of cardiotocography is indicated in the presence of a defined maternal and fetal risk factors. While the NICE guidelines recommend cardiotocography in the case of maternal hypertension, as well as preeclampsia, the German guidelines as well as SOGC list considerably more risk factors. Intrapartually, the recommendations vary greatly from country to country. While German guidelines suggest the use of cardiotocography from late 1st stage of labor, the other countries strongly recommend the auscultation of the fetal heart rate of non-risk pregnancies. This is due to the current study situation, which does not show any advantage of cardiotocography as opposed to intermittent auscultation. Furthermore studies have indicated that the use of cardiotocography caused an increase in iatrogenic induced cesarean sections. In high risk pregnancies the use of cardiotocography is strongly recommended in the compared countries, however there are major differences in the definition of high risk pregnancy and therefore the indication for cardiotocographic monitoring.
CONCLUSION: Intermittent auscultation is a more cost-effective alternative compared to cardiotocography. However, in the case of legal litigation intermittent auscultation is harder to reconstruct the well-being of the newborn during birth. On the other hand cardiotocography might result in a higher cesarean section rate, but can be more helpful to prove fetal well-being during birth for a legal litigation process. Despite the lack of evidence only German guidelines recommend cardiotocographic monitoring from the late 1st stage of labor for risk-free pregnancies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2018
PMID： 29475210 DOI： 10.1055/s-0043-122945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol ISSN： 0948-2393 Impact factor: 0.685