Literature DB >> 29474879

Quantitative analysis of relative volume of low apparent diffusion coefficient value can predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest.

Hyung Ki Moon1, Jinhee Jang2, Kyu Nam Park1, Soo Hyun Kim1, Byung Kook Lee3, Sang Hoon Oh1, Kyung Woon Jeung3, Seung Pill Choi4, In Soo Cho5, Chun Song Youn6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Predicting neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. This study tested the hypothesis that a quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL) can predict neurologic outcomes after CA and can clarify the optimal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds for predicting poor neurologic outcomes.
METHODS: Out-of-hospital CA patients treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) who underwent DWI were included in this study. Voxel-based analysis was performed to calculate the mean ADC value. ADC thresholds (750, 700, 650, 600, 550, 500, 450 and 400) and brain volumes below each threshold were also analyzed for their correlation with outcomes. The patients were divided into early (within 48 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)) and late group (between 48 h and 7 days after ROSC) according to the DWI scan time. The primary outcome was a poor neurologic outcome at 6 months after CA, defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 3-5.
RESULTS: One hundred ten DWIs were analyzed. The mean ADC values were 789.0 (761.5-826.5) × 10-6 mm2/s for the good neurologic outcome group and 715.2 (663.1-778.4) × 10-6 mm2/s for the poor neurologic outcome group (p < 0.001). All the ADC thresholds could differentiate patients with good versus poor outcomes. The ADC threshold of 400 × 10-6 mm2/s had the highest odds ratio (4.648 in the early group and 11.283 in the late group) after adjusting for initial rhythm and anoxic time. To achieve 100% specificity using an ADC threshold of 400 × 10-6 mm2/s, the sensitivity was 64% (cutoff value; >2.5% ADC threshold of 400 × 10-6 mm2/s) in the early group and 79.2% (cutoff value; >1.66% ADC threshold of 400 × 10-6 mm2/s) in the late group.
CONCLUSIONS: Voxel-based analysis using FSL software can predict neurologic outcomes after CA. The ADC threshold of 400 × 10-6 mm2/s had the highest OR for predicting a poor neurologic outcome.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Hypothermia; Induced; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29474879     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Sofia Cacciola; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Marlijn J A Kamps; Mauro Oddo; Fabio S Taccone; Arianna Di Rocco; Frederick J A Meijer; Erik Westhall; Massimo Antonelli; Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Tobias Cronberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Cardiovascular risk factors differently affect the survival of patients undergoing manual or mechanical resuscitation.

Authors:  Dóra Ujvárosy; Veronika Sebestyén; Tamás Pataki; Tamás Ötvös; István Lőrincz; György Paragh; Zoltán Szabó
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Does Combining Biomarkers and Brain Images Provide Improved Prognostic Predictive Performance for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors before Target Temperature Management?

Authors:  Seung Ha Son; In Ho Lee; Jung Soo Park; In Sool Yoo; Seung Whan Kim; Jin Woong Lee; Seung Ryu; Yeonho You; Jin Hong Min; Yong Chul Cho; Won Joon Jeong; Se Kwang Oh; Sung Uk Cho; Hong Joon Ahn; Changshin Kang; Dong Hun Lee; Byung Kook Lee; Chun Song Youn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Tobias Cronberg; Mypinder Sekhon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  External validation of the 2020 ERC/ESICM prognostication strategy algorithm after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Chun Song Youn; Kyu Nam Park; Soo Hyun Kim; Byung Kook Lee; Tobias Cronberg; Sang Hoon Oh; Kyung Woon Jeung; In Soo Cho; Seung Pill Choi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Prediction of poor outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruili Wei; Chaonan Wang; Fangping He; Lirong Hong; Jie Zhang; Wangxiao Bao; Fangxia Meng; Benyan Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.