Laura D Ellingson1,2,3, Aaron J Stegner1,2, Isaac J Schwabacher1,2, Jacob B Lindheimer1,2, Dane B Cook1,2. 1. William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Abstract
Background: Pain modulation is a critical function of the nociceptive system that includes the ability to engage descending pain control systems to maintain a functional balance between facilitation and inhibition of incoming sensory stimuli. Dysfunctional pain modulation is associated with increased risk for chronic pain and is characteristic of fibromyalgia (FM). Catastrophizing is also common in FM. However, its influence on pain modulation is poorly understood. Objective: To determine the role of catastrophizing on central nervous system processing during pain modulation in FM via examining brain responses and pain sensitivity during an attention-distraction paradigm. Methods: Twenty FM patients and 18 healthy controls (CO) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while receiving pain stimuli, administered alone and during distracting cognitive tasks. Pain ratings were assessed after each stimulus. Catastrophizing was assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Results: The ability to modulate pain during distraction varied among FM patients and was associated with catastrophizing. This was demonstrated by significant positive relationships between PCS scores and pain ratings (P < 0.05) and brain responses in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (P < 0.01). Relationships between catastrophizing and pain modulation did not differ between FM and CO (P > 0.05). Conclusions: FM patients with higher levels of catastrophizing were less able to distract themselves from pain, indicative of catastrophizing-related impairments in pain modulation. These results suggest that the tendency to catastrophize interacts with attention-resource allocation and may represent a mechanism of chronic pain exacerbation and/or maintenance. Reducing catastrophizing may improve FM symptoms via improving central nervous system regulation of pain.
Background: Pain modulation is a critical function of the nociceptive system that includes the ability to engage descending pain control systems to maintain a functional balance between facilitation and inhibition of incoming sensory stimuli. Dysfunctional pain modulation is associated with increased risk for chronic pain and is characteristic of fibromyalgia (FM). Catastrophizing is also common in FM. However, its influence on pain modulation is poorly understood. Objective: To determine the role of catastrophizing on central nervous system processing during pain modulation in FM via examining brain responses and pain sensitivity during an attention-distraction paradigm. Methods: Twenty FM patients and 18 healthy controls (CO) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while receiving pain stimuli, administered alone and during distracting cognitive tasks. Pain ratings were assessed after each stimulus. Catastrophizing was assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Results: The ability to modulate pain during distraction varied among FM patients and was associated with catastrophizing. This was demonstrated by significant positive relationships between PCS scores and pain ratings (P < 0.05) and brain responses in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (P < 0.01). Relationships between catastrophizing and pain modulation did not differ between FM and CO (P > 0.05). Conclusions: FM patients with higher levels of catastrophizing were less able to distract themselves from pain, indicative of catastrophizing-related impairments in pain modulation. These results suggest that the tendency to catastrophize interacts with attention-resource allocation and may represent a mechanism of chronic pain exacerbation and/or maintenance. Reducing catastrophizing may improve FM symptoms via improving central nervous system regulation of pain.
Authors: Catherine S Hubbard; Asimina Lazaridou; Christine M Cahalan; Jieun Kim; Robert R Edwards; Vitaly Napadow; Marco L Loggia Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Ellen L Terry; Jared J Tanner; Josue S Cardoso; Kimberly T Sibille; Song Lai; Hrishikesh Deshpande; Georg Deutsch; Catherine C Price; Roland Staud; Burel R Goodin; David T Redden; Roger B Fillingim Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2022-02-20 Impact factor: 4.433
Authors: Jacob B Lindheimer; Aaron J Stegner; Stephanie M Van Riper; Jacob V Ninneman; Laura D Ellingson; Dane B Cook Journal: Life Sci Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.780
Authors: Alexandra Braun; Dimitar Evdokimov; Johanna Frank; Paul Pauli; Nurcan Üçeyler; Claudia Sommer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cecilia Peñacoba; Irene López-Gómez; Maria Angeles Pastor-Mira; Sofía López-Roig; Carmen Ecija Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.240