Literature DB >> 29474128

Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): the Cosmetics Europe database<sup/>.

Sebastian Hoffmann1, Nicole Kleinstreuer2, Nathalie Alépée3, David Allen4, Anne Marie Api5, Takao Ashikaga6, Elodie Clouet7, Magalie Cluzel8, Bertrand Desprez9, Nichola Gellatly10, Carsten Goebel11, Petra S Kern12, Martina Klaric9, Jochen Kühnl13, Jon F Lalko5, Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier3, Karsten Mewes14, Masaaki Miyazawa15, Rahul Parakhia5, Erwin van Vliet16, Qingda Zang4, Dirk Petersohn14.   

Abstract

Cosmetics Europe, the European Trade Association for the cosmetics and personal care industry, is conducting a multi-phase program to develop regulatory accepted, animal-free testing strategies enabling the cosmetics industry to conduct safety assessments. Based on a systematic evaluation of test methods for skin sensitization, five non-animal test methods (DPRA (Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay), KeratinoSensTM, h-CLAT (human cell line activation test), U-SENSTM, SENS-IS) were selected for inclusion in a comprehensive database of 128 substances. Existing data were compiled and completed with newly generated data, the latter amounting to one-third of all data. The database was complemented with human and local lymph node assay (LLNA) reference data, physicochemical properties and use categories, and thoroughly curated. Focused on the availability of human data, the substance selection resulted nevertheless resulted in a high diversity of chemistries in terms of physico-chemical property ranges and use categories. Predictivities of skin sensitization potential and potency, where applicable, were calculated for the LLNA as compared to human data and for the individual test methods compared to both human and LLNA reference data. In addition, various aspects of applicability of the test methods were analyzed. Due to its high level of curation, comprehensiveness, and completeness, we propose our database as a point of reference for the evaluation and development of testing strategies, as done for example in the associated work of Kleinstreuer et al. We encourage the community to use it to meet the challenge of conducting skin sensitization safety assessment without generating new animal data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LLNA; Skin sensitization; database; defined approach; human reference data; in chemico; in vitro; non-animal; test methods; testing strategy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29474128     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  15 in total

1.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Safety assessment of cosmetics by read across applied to metabolomics data of in vitro skin and liver models.

Authors:  Carine Jacques; Emilien L Jamin; Isabelle Jouanin; Cécile Canlet; Marie Tremblay-Franco; Jean-François Martin; Daniel Zalko; Yves Brunel; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Laurent Debrauwer; Pierre-Jacques Ferret; Hélène Duplan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; James Truax; Marco Corvaro; Raja Settivari; Joseph Henriquez; Jeremy McFadden; Travis Gulledge; Victor Johnson; Sean Gehen; Dori Germolec; David G Allen; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Applying evidence-based methods to the development and use of adverse outcome pathways

Authors:  Rob B M De Vries; Michelle Angrish; Patience Browne; Jan Brozek; Andrew A Rooney; Daniele S Wikoff; Paul Whaley; Stephen W Edwards; Rebecca L Morgan; Ingrid L Druwe; Sebastian Hoffmann; Thomas Hartung; Kristina Thayer; Marc T Avey; Brandiese E J Beverly; Maicon Falavigna; Catherine Gibbons; Katy Goyak; Andrew Kraft; Fernando Nampo; Amir Qaseem; Meg Sears; Jasvinder A Singh; Catherine Willett; Erin Y Yost; Holger Schünemann; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.250

5.  Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates.

Authors:  Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Carien Kouwenaar; Frans R Stafleu; André Bleich; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Rob B M De Vries; Franck L B Meijboom
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Els Adriaens; Amber Edwards; Veronika Zuckerstätter; Anders Jerre; Florence Burleson; Helge Gehrke; Erwin L Roggen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Skin Doctor CP: Conformal Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Anke Wilm; Ulf Norinder; M Isabel Agea; Christina de Bruyn Kops; Conrad Stork; Jochen Kühnl; Johannes Kirchmair
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Quo vadis blood protein adductomics?

Authors:  Gabriele Sabbioni; Billy W Day
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Quantitative assessment of sensitizing potency using a dose-response adaptation of GARDskin.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Andy Forreryd; Ulrika Mattson; Anders Jerre; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Navigating the Minefield of Computational Toxicology and Informatics: Looking Back and Charting a New Horizon.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.