BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiarrhythmic β-blockers are used in patients at risk of myocardial ischaemia, but the survival benefit and mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesized that β-blockers do not prevent ventricular fibrillation (VF) but instead inhibit the ability of catecholamines to facilitate ischaemia-induced VF, limiting the scope of their usefulness. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: ECGs were analysed from ischaemic Langendorff-perfused rat hearts perfused with adrenoceptor antagonists and/or exogenous catecholamines (CATs: 313 nM noradrenaline + 75 nM adrenaline) in a blinded and randomized study. Ischaemic zone (IZ) size was deliberately made small or large. KEY RESULTS: In rat hearts with large IZs, ischaemia-induced VF incidence was high in controls. Atenolol, butoxamine and trimazosin did not affect VF at concentrations with β1 -, β2 - or α1 - adrenoceptor specificity and selectivity (confirmed in separate rat aortae myography experiments). In hearts with small IZs and low baseline incidence of ischaemia-induced VF, CATs, delivered to the uninvolved zone (UZ), increased ischaemia-induced VF incidence. This effect was not mimicked by atrial pacing, hence, not due to sinus tachycardia. However, the CATs-facilitated increase in ischaemia-induced VF was inhibited by atenolol and butoxamine (but not trimazosin), indicative of β1 - and β2 - but not α1 -adrenoceptor involvement (confirmed by immunoblot analysis of downstream phosphoproteins). CATs did not facilitate VF in low-flow globally ischaemic hearts, which have no UZ. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Catecholamines facilitated ischaemia-induced VF when risk was low, acting via β1 - and β2 - adrenoceptors located in the UZ. There was no scope for facilitation when VF risk was high (large IZ), which may explain why β-blockers have equivocal effectiveness in humans.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiarrhythmic β-blockers are used in patients at risk of myocardial ischaemia, but the survival benefit and mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesized that β-blockers do not prevent ventricular fibrillation (VF) but instead inhibit the ability of catecholamines to facilitate ischaemia-induced VF, limiting the scope of their usefulness. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: ECGs were analysed from ischaemic Langendorff-perfused rat hearts perfused with adrenoceptor antagonists and/or exogenous catecholamines (CATs: 313 nM noradrenaline + 75 nM adrenaline) in a blinded and randomized study. Ischaemic zone (IZ) size was deliberately made small or large. KEY RESULTS: In rat hearts with large IZs, ischaemia-induced VF incidence was high in controls. Atenolol, butoxamine and trimazosin did not affect VF at concentrations with β1 -, β2 - or α1 - adrenoceptor specificity and selectivity (confirmed in separate rat aortae myography experiments). In hearts with small IZs and low baseline incidence of ischaemia-induced VF, CATs, delivered to the uninvolved zone (UZ), increased ischaemia-induced VF incidence. This effect was not mimicked by atrial pacing, hence, not due to sinus tachycardia. However, the CATs-facilitated increase in ischaemia-induced VF was inhibited by atenolol and butoxamine (but not trimazosin), indicative of β1 - and β2 - but not α1 -adrenoceptor involvement (confirmed by immunoblot analysis of downstream phosphoproteins). CATs did not facilitate VF in low-flow globally ischaemic hearts, which have no UZ. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Catecholamines facilitated ischaemia-induced VF when risk was low, acting via β1 - and β2 - adrenoceptors located in the UZ. There was no scope for facilitation when VF risk was high (large IZ), which may explain why β-blockers have equivocal effectiveness in humans.
Authors: Benjamin R Nixon; Shane D Walton; Bo Zhang; Elizabeth A Brundage; Sean C Little; Mark T Ziolo; Jonathan P Davis; Brandon J Biesiadecki Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Doreen Richardt; Andreas Dendorfer; Ralph Tölg; Peter Dominiak; Gert Richardt Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Alena S Tsvetkova; Olesya G Bernikova; Natalya J Mikhaleva; Darya S Khramova; Alexey O Ovechkin; Marina M Demidova; Pyotr G Platonov; Jan E Azarov Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 5.923