Literature DB >> 29473092

Four-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation using multiple conditioning inputs. Normative MEP responses.

Blair Calancie1, Dongliang Wang2, Eufrosina Young3, Natalia Alexeeva4.   

Abstract

A four-pulse pattern of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was compared to traditional dual-pulse TMS for its ability to modulate motor cortical excitability. This novel pattern consisted of a three-pulse train of subthreshold conditioning pulses followed by a suprathreshold test pulse (i.e., SC-T). The intervals between these superconditioning (SC) pulses (1, 3, or 6 ms) and the follow-on test pulse (1, 3, 10, or 25 ms) were varied, and the resultant MEPs were compared to those elicited by: (1) single-pulse TMS; and (2) dual-pulse conditioning-test (C-T) TMS with either short (3 ms) or long (10 ms) intervals to elicit short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) or intracortical facilitation (ICF), respectively. Testing included abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) in 15 neurologically normal adults. For superconditioning inputs, 10 ms test intervals caused especially strong facilitation of the test MEP, while 1 ms test intervals were particularly effective at causing inhibition of the test response. For both muscles and across all subjects, the most effective of the 12 SC-T inputs tested for causing either facilitation or inhibition was-with rare exception-superior to the dual-pulse TMS input for causing facilitation (i.e., ICF) or inhibition (i.e., SICI), while the overall magnitude of effect was more pronounced in APB compared to TA. Nevertheless, after normalization, the impact of a superconditioning input train on the test MEP was similar in APB and TA muscles, suggesting similar mechanisms of action. Limited findings from a single subject with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are included to further illustrate the potential advantages of using a train of conditioning pulses preceding a TMS test pulse to selectively investigate abnormal motor cortical excitatory and inhibitory circuitry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioning-test; Excitability; Intracortical facilitation; Motor cortex; Motor evoked potential; Short-interval intracortical inhibition; TMS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29473092     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5212-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  53 in total

1.  Modulation of intracortical excitability for different muscles in the upper extremity: paired magnetic stimulation study with focal versus non-focal coils.

Authors:  T Shimizu; M M Filippi; M G Palmieri; M Oliveri; F Vernieri; P Pasqualetti; P M Rossini
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  TMS and drugs.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

4.  Impaired motor cortex inhibition in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Evidence from paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  U Ziemann; M Winter; C D Reimers; K Reimers; F Tergau; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Double cortical stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  T Yokota; A Yoshino; A Inaba; Y Saito
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  B Calancie; W Harris; J G Broton; N Alexeeva; B A Green
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Assessment of the upper motor neuron in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  William Huynh; Neil G Simon; Julian Grosskreutz; Martin R Turner; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Walter Paulus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The effect of short-duration bursts of high-frequency, low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  2 in total

1.  Superconditioning TMS for examining upper motor neuron function in MND.

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Eufrosina Young; Mary Lou Watson; Dongliang Wang; Natalia Alexeeva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Impact of the number of conditioning pulses on motor cortex excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Petyo Nikolov; Johanna V Zimmermann; Shady S Hassan; Philipp Albrecht; Alfons Schnitzler; Stefan J Groiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.