Literature DB >> 29472824

Active Surveillance Use Among a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Population in a Large US Payer System: 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Versus Other Risk Stratification Methods.

Steven Canfield1, Michael J Kemeter2, John Hornberger2, Phillip G Febbo2.   

Abstract

Many men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) receive definitive treatment despite recommendations that have been informed by two large, randomized trials encouraging active surveillance (AS). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Optum™ Research Database (Eden Prairie, MN) of electronic health records and administrative claims data to assess AS use for patients tested with a 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score™ (GPS; Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA) assay and/or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). De-identified records were extracted on health plan members enrolled from June 2013 to June 2016 who had ≥1 record of PCa (n 5 291,876). Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, new diagnosis, American Urological Association low-risk PCa (stage T1-T2a, prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL, Gleason score 5 6), and clinical activity for at least 12 months before and after diagnosis. Data included baseline characteristics, use of GPS testing and/or MRI, and definitive procedures. GPS or MRI testing was performed in 17% of men (GPS, n 5 375, 4%; MRI, n 5 1174, 13%). AS use varied from a low of 43% for men who only underwent MRI to 89% for GPStested men who did not undergo MRI (P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, AS use was 31.0% higher (95% CI, 27.6%-34.5%; P <.001) for men receiving the GPS test only versus men who did not undergo GPS testing or MRI; the difference was 30.5% at 12-month follow-up. In a large US payer system, the GPS assay was associated with significantly higher AS use at 6 and 12 months compared with men who had MRI only, or no GPS or MRI testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Comparative; Evidence-based practice; Genomic biomarker; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; effectiveness research

Year:  2017        PMID: 29472824      PMCID: PMC5811877          DOI: 10.3909/riu0786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  23 in total

1.  Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler; William J Aronson; Michael K Brawer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Maggie J Bierlein; Samuel R Kaufman; Lindsey Herrel; Ted A Skolarus; David C Miller; Vahakn B Shahinian
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  AUA Policy Statement on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pat F Fulgham; Daniel B Rukstalis; Ismail Baris Turkbey; Jonathan N Rubenstein; Samir Taneja; Peter R Carroll; Peter A Pinto; Marc A Bjurlin; Scott Eggener
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Patient-specific Meta-analysis of 2 Clinical Validation Studies to Predict Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Using the 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Nan Zhang; Michael R Crager; Tara Maddala; Anne Dee; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Jeffry P Simko; Matthew R Cooperberg; Shiv Srivastava; Inger L Rosner; June M Chan; Phillip G Febbo; Peter R Carroll; Jennifer Cullen; H Jeffrey Lawrence
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  A Systematic Approach to Discussing Active Surveillance with Patients with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Melissa Assel; Nicole Benfante; Deepak Malhotra; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Variation in the use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Björn Löppenberg; David F Friedlander; Anna Krasnova; Andrew Tam; Jeffrey J Leow; Paul L Nguyen; Hawa Barry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Mani Menon; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Maxine Sun; Toni K Choueiri; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Canagliflozin treatment of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes in a US managed care setting.

Authors:  Wing Chow; Erin Buysman; Marcia F T Rupnow; Richard Aguilar; Henry J Henk
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.580

8.  Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael L Cher; Apoorv Dhir; Gregory B Auffenberg; Susan Linsell; Yuqing Gao; Bradley Rosenberg; S Mohammad Jafri; Laurence Klotz; David C Miller; Khurshid R Ghani; Steven J Bernstein; James E Montie; Brian R Lane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men with Clinically Localized Disease.

Authors:  Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Ruixiao Lu; Nan Zhang; Charles P Quesenberry; Jun Shan; Jeong S Han; Athanasios C Tsiatis; Amethyst D Leimpeter; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Matthew R Cooperberg; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jeffry P Simko; Sara M Falzarano; Tara Maddala; June M Chan; Jianbo Li; Janet E Cowan; Athanasios C Tsiatis; Diana B Cherbavaz; Robert J Pelham; Imelda Tenggara-Hunter; Frederick L Baehner; Dejan Knezevic; Phillip G Febbo; Steven Shak; Michael W Kattan; Mark Lee; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

1.  Balancing Confounding and Generalizability Using Observational, Real-world Data: 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Effect on Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Steven Canfield; Michael J Kemeter; Phillip G Febbo; John Hornberger
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

2.  The Association of the Long Prostate Cancer Expressed PDE4D Transcripts to Poor Patient Outcome Depends on the Tumour's TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Status.

Authors:  Dianne van Strijp; Christiane de Witz; Birthe Heitkötter; Sebastian Huss; Martin Bögemann; George S Baillie; Miles D Houslay; Chris Bangma; Axel Semjonow; Ralf Hoffmann
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2019-06-02

3.  Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for inpatients with COVID-19 in the US from September 2020 to February 2021.

Authors:  Olulade Ayodele; Kaili Ren; Jing Zhao; James Signorovitch; Michele Jonsson Funk; Julia Zhu; Ying Bao; Kathleen Gondek; Hillary Keenan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.