Literature DB >> 29472087

An assessment of a 3D EPID-based dosimetry system using conventional two- and three-dimensional detectors for VMAT.

S Stevens1, P Dvorak2, V Spevacek3, K Pilarova3, M Bray-Parry4, J Gesner4, A Richmond4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a 3D dosimetric evaluation of a commercial portal dosimetry system using 2D/3D detectors under ideal conditions using VMAT.
METHODS: A 2D ion chamber array, radiochromic film and gel dosimeter were utilised to provide a dosimetric evaluation of transit phantom and pre-treatment 'fluence' EPID back-projected dose distributions for a standard VMAT plan. In-house 2D and 3D gamma methods compared pass statistics relative to each dosimeter and TPS dose distributions.
RESULTS: Fluence mode and transit EPID dose distributions back-projected onto phantom geometry produced 2D gamma pass rates in excess of 97% relative to other tested detectors and exported TPS dose planes when a 3%, 3 mm global gamma criterion was applied. Use of a gel dosimeter within a glass vial allowed comparison of measured 3D dose distributions versus EPID 3D dose and TPS calculated distributions. 3D gamma comparisons between modalities at 3%, 3 mm gave pass rates in excess of 92%. Use of fluence mode was indicative of transit results under ideal conditions with slightly reduced dose definition.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D EPID back projected dose distributions were validated against detectors in both 2D and 3D. Cross validation of transit dose delivered to a patient is limited due to reasons of practicality and the tests presented are recommended as a guideline for 3D EPID dosimetry commissioning; allowing direct comparison between detector, TPS, fluence and transit modes. The results indicate achievable gamma scores for a complex VMAT plan in a homogenous phantom geometry and contributes to growing experience of 3D EPID dosimetry.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D dose comparison; Absolute dosimetric verification; EPID; Portal dosimetry; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29472087     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  3 in total

1.  Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.

Authors:  Stefano Piffer; Marta Casati; Livia Marrazzo; Chiara Arilli; Silvia Calusi; Isacco Desideri; Franco Fusi; Stefania Pallotta; Cinzia Talamonti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  A transit portal dosimetry method for respiratory gating quality assurance with a dynamic 3D printed tumor phantom.

Authors:  Hong Qi Tan; Calvin Wei Yang Koh; Lloyd Kuan Rui Tan; Kah Seng Lew; Clifford Ghee Ann Chua; Khong Wei Ang; James Cheow Lei Lee; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  Validation of new transmission detector transmission factors for online dosimetry: an experimental study.

Authors:  So-Yeon Park; Jong Min Park; Jung-In Kim; Sungyoung Lee; Chang Heon Choi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.