| Literature DB >> 29472034 |
Verena Schrameyer1, Paul H York2, Kathryn Chartrand3, Peter J Ralph4, Michael Kühl1, Kasper Elgetti Brodersen5, Michael A Rasheed2.
Abstract
Seagrass meadows increasingly face reduced light availability as a consequence of coastal development, eutrophication, and climate-driven increases in rainfall leading to turbidity plumes. We examined the impact of reduced light on above-ground seagrass biomass and sediment biogeochemistry in tropical shallow- (∼2 m) and deep-water (∼17 m) seagrass meadows (Green Island, Australia). Artificial shading (transmitting ∼10-25% of incident solar irradiance) was applied to the shallow- and deep-water sites for up to two weeks. While above-ground biomass was unchanged, higher diffusive O2 uptake (DOU) rates, lower O2 penetration depths, and higher volume-specific O2 consumption (R) rates were found in seagrass-vegetated sediments as compared to adjacent bare sand (control) areas at the shallow-water sites. In contrast, deep-water sediment characteristics did not differ between bare sand and vegetated sites. At the vegetated shallow-water site, shading resulted in significantly lower hydrogen sulphide (H2S) levels in the sediment. No shading effects were found on sediment biogeochemistry at the deep-water site. Overall, our results show that the sediment biogeochemistry of shallow-water (Halodule uninervis, Syringodium isoetifolium, Cymodocea rotundata and C. serrulata) and deep-water (Halophila decipiens) seagrass meadows with different species differ in response to reduced light. The light-driven dynamics of the sediment biogeochemistry at the shallow-water site could suggest the presence of a microbial consortium, which might be stimulated by photosynthetically produced exudates from the seagrass, which becomes limited due to lower seagrass photosynthesis under shaded conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonate sediment; Hydrogen sulphide; Light; O(2) demand; Seagrass; Shading; Tropical
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29472034 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Environ Res ISSN: 0141-1136 Impact factor: 3.130