E Furtado da Luz1, J U Braga2. 1. Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. 2. Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Abstract
SETTING: According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, the under-reporting rate for tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Verde between 2006 and 2012 was 49%. However, the WHO recognises the challenges associated with this estimation process and recommends implementing other methods, such as record linkage, to combat TB under-reporting. OBJECTIVES: To estimate and analyse under-reporting of cases by TB surveillance health units and to evaluate TB cases retrieved from other TB diagnostic sources in Praia, Cape Verde, from 2006 to 2012. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study evaluated under-reporting using the following data: 1) the under-reporting index from TB reporting health units (RHUs), where the number of validated TB cases from RHUs was compared with data from the National Programme for the Fight against Tuberculosis and Leprosy (NPFTL); and 2) the under-reporting index among overall data sources, or a comparison of the number of all validated TB cases from all sources with NPFTL data. RESULTS: The TB under-reporting rate was 40% in Praia during the study period, and results were influenced by laboratory findings. CONCLUSION: The TB under-reporting rate was very similar to the rate estimated by the WHO. TB surveillance must be improved to reduce under-reporting.
SETTING: According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, the under-reporting rate for tuberculosis (TB) in Cape Verde between 2006 and 2012 was 49%. However, the WHO recognises the challenges associated with this estimation process and recommends implementing other methods, such as record linkage, to combat TB under-reporting. OBJECTIVES: To estimate and analyse under-reporting of cases by TB surveillance health units and to evaluate TB cases retrieved from other TB diagnostic sources in Praia, Cape Verde, from 2006 to 2012. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study evaluated under-reporting using the following data: 1) the under-reporting index from TB reporting health units (RHUs), where the number of validated TB cases from RHUs was compared with data from the National Programme for the Fight against Tuberculosis and Leprosy (NPFTL); and 2) the under-reporting index among overall data sources, or a comparison of the number of all validated TB cases from all sources with NPFTL data. RESULTS: The TB under-reporting rate was 40% in Praia during the study period, and results were influenced by laboratory findings. CONCLUSION: The TB under-reporting rate was very similar to the rate estimated by the WHO. TB surveillance must be improved to reduce under-reporting.
Authors: Tao Li; Lijia Yang; Sarah E Smith-Jeffcoat; Alice Wang; Hui Guo; Wei Chen; Xin Du; Hui Zhang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: M Gidado; E M H Mitchell; A O Adejumo; J Levy; O Emperor; A Lawson; N Chukwueme; H Abdur-Razak; A Idris; A Adebowale Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2022-09-21