Literature DB >> 29470685

The effect of halogen light stimulation on duration of ultrasound parameters of biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial.

Mohammad Ghasem Hanafi1, Aliakbar Sahraeizadeh2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective is to assess if fetal halogen light stimulation can reduce the time needed to obtain a normal biophysical profile (BPP).
METHODS: Patients scheduled for a BPP and who satisfied the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomized to halogen light stimulation and no stimulation groups. The study group was exposed to handheld halogen light for 10 s whenever fetal breathing, movement, or tone was absent through the first 5 min of BPP. The time required to achieve complete BPP score was recorded. In patients with complete BPP score who had delivery within 1 week after the test, perinatal morbidity was examined.
RESULTS: A total of 598 patients were randomized (light = 302, no light = 296). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of gestational age, maternal age, body mass index, and indication for BPP except for preterm labor (light: 9%, no light: 4%, p = 0.03). Among the patients who had a normal BPP score (n = 507), the mean (light: 7.1 ± 6 min, no light: 12.3 ± 8 min, p < 0.0001) and median (light: 4.3, no light: 8, p = 0.004) time needed to complete the BPP score was significantly less in the light stimulation group than the no stimulation group. Perinatal outcomes were not different between groups who had delivery during the first week after BPP.
CONCLUSION: Fetal halogen light stimulation can be utilized to reduce the time needed to complete a BPP. However, further studies should be conducted in order to determine the effect of this method on decreasing non-reassuring test results. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was submitted to the Registry of Clinical Trials on 04/20/2017 (IRCT2017041633470N1). After IRCT registration on 06/07/2017, we recruited patients from 06/08/2017 till 10/15/2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antepartum testing; Biophysical profile; Halogen light stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29470685     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-018-0873-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  32 in total

Review 1.  Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Frank A Manning
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Effect of halogen light stimulation on nonstress testing.

Authors:  Bruno J Caridi; Jay M Bolnick; Beverly G Fletcher; William F Rayburn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Using fetal acoustic stimulation to shorten the biophysical profile.

Authors:  Michael G Pinette; Jacquelyn Blackstone; Joseph R Wax; Angelina Cartin
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  Fetal responses to vibratory acoustic stimulation: influence of basal heart rate.

Authors:  R Gagnon; C Hunse; J Patrick
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test.

Authors:  F A Manning; I Morrison; I R Lange; C R Harman; P F Chamberlain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.

Authors:  A M Vintzileos; W A Campbell; C J Ingardia; D J Nochimson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Fetal biophysical profile scoring: a prospective study in 1,184 high-risk patients.

Authors:  F A Manning; T F Baskett; I Morrison; I Lange
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Effect of ambient light on the time needed to complete a fetal biophysical profile: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heather M Said; Shweta Gupta; Laura K Vricella; Katy Wand; Thinh Nguyen; Gilad Gross
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Design of a light stimulator for fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  J D Wilson; A J Adams; P Murphy; H Eswaran; H Preissl
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.833

10.  Selecting an external light source for fetal biophysical testing.

Authors:  Brittany B Rayburn; Daniel P Theele; Jay M Bolnick; William F Rayburn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.