Literature DB >> 29470127

Telemedicine Physical Examination Utilizing a Consumer Device Demonstrates Poor Concordance with In-Person Physical Examination in Emergency Department Patients with Sore Throat: A Prospective Blinded Study.

Moneeb Akhtar1, Paul G Van Heukelom1, Azeemuddin Ahmed1, Rachel D Tranter1, Erinn White1, Nathaniel Shekem1, David Walz1, Catherine Fairfield1, J Priyanka Vakkalanka1,2, Nicholas M Mohr1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine allows patients to connect with healthcare providers remotely. It has recently expanded to evaluate low-acuity illnesses such as pharyngitis by using patients' personal communication devices. The purpose of our study was to compare the telemedicine-facilitated physical examination with an in-person examination in emergency department (ED) patients with sore throat.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, blinded diagnostic concordance study of patients being seen for sore throat in a 60,000-visit Midwestern academic ED. A telemedicine and a face-to-face examination were performed independently by two advanced practice providers (APP), blinded to the results of the other evaluator. The primary outcome was agreement on pharyngeal redness between the evaluators, with secondary outcomes of agreement and inter-rater reliability on 14 other aspects of the pharyngeal physical examination. We also conducted a survey of patients and providers to evaluate perceptions and preferences for sore throat evaluation using telemedicine.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled, with a median tonsil size of 1.0. Inter-rater agreement (kappa) for tonsil size was 0.394, which was worse than our predetermined concordance threshold. Other kappa values ranged from 0 to 0.434, and telemedicine was best for detecting abnormal coloration of the palate and tender superficial cervical lymph nodes (anterior structures), but poor for detecting abnormal submandibular lymph nodes or asymmetry of the posterior pharynx (posterior structures). In survey responses, telemedicine was judged easier to use and more comfortable for providers than patients; however, neither patients nor providers preferred in-person to telemedicine evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Telemedicine exhibited poor agreement with the in-person physical examination on the primary outcome of tonsil size, but exhibited moderate agreement on coloration of the palate and cervical lymphadenopathy. Future work should better characterize the importance of the physical examination in treatment decisions for patients with sore throat and the use of telemedicine in avoiding in-person healthcare visits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery of healthcare; pharyngitis; sore throat; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29470127      PMCID: PMC6205037          DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  23 in total

1.  Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. The clinical diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  John W Hafner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Some Thumbs Up, Some Down, on Telehealth Quality of Care.

Authors:  Richard Mark Kirkner
Journal:  Manag Care       Date:  2017-04

3.  Reasons for Emergency Room Use Among U.S. Adults Aged 18-64: National Health Interview Survey, 2013 and 2014.

Authors:  Renee M Gindi; Lindsey I Black; Robin A Cohen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 4.  The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan R Carapetis; Andrew C Steer; E Kim Mulholland; Martin Weber
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Antibiotic treatment of children with sore throat.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; David W Bates; Grace M Lee; Jonathan A Finkelstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patient and physician satisfaction with telemedicine for monitoring vital signs.

Authors:  R L Bratton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.184

7.  A telemedicine model for emergency care in a short-term correctional facility.

Authors:  D G Ellis; J Mayrose; D V Jehle; R M Moscati; G J Pierluisi
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 8.  Evidence-based diagnostics: adult septic arthritis.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Jeremiah D Schuur; Worth W Everett; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Does this patient have appendicitis?

Authors:  J M Wagner; W P McKinney; J L Carpenter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke: interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system.

Authors:  René Handschu; Rebekka Littmann; Udo Reulbach; Charly Gaul; Josef G Heckmann; Bernhard Neundörfer; Mateusz Scibor
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  9 in total

1.  Telemedicine use in orthopaedics: Experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Brian Z Chin; Nazrul Nashi; Shuxun Lin; Kevin Yik; Gamaliel Tan; Fareed Hy Kagda
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.344

2.  Remote Auscultation of Heart and Lungs as an Acceptable Alternative to Legacy Measures in Quarantined COVID-19 Patients-Prospective Evaluation of 250 Examinations.

Authors:  Or Haskel; Edward Itelman; Eyal Zilber; Galia Barkai; Gad Segal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Patient experiences with telehealth in sleep medicine: a qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  Lucas M Donovan; Ashley C Mog; Kelly N Blanchard; Kate H Magid; Adnan S Syed; Lynette R Kelley; Brian N Palen; Elizabeth C Parsons; Catherine C McCall; William Thompson; Matthew Charlton; Laura J Spece; Susan Kirsh; David H Au; George G Sayre
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 4.  [Telemedicine in the fight against SARS-COV-2-opportunities and possible applications in otorhinolaryngology : Narrative review].

Authors:  Daniel Hagge; Andreas Knopf; Benedikt Hofauer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Lemonade from Lemons-Using COVID Downtime to Teach Essential Telemedicine Skills.

Authors:  Stefanos F Haddad; Michael T Mulligan; Heather Frenz; Mara McErlean; Richard L Uhl
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Do Not Give Up Your Stethoscopes Yet-Telemedicine for Chronic Respiratory Diseases in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephen Simeone; Daniel Condit; Evan Nadler
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 7.  A scoping review of the unassisted physical exam conducted over synchronous audio-video telemedicine.

Authors:  Peter Yao; Mahad Adam; Sunday Clark; Hanson Hsu; Michael Stern; Rahul Sharma; Keith Mages; Peter Greenwald; Neel Naik
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-13

8.  COVID-19: Initiating the Expansion of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Kristopher A Lyon; Xiaoming Qi; Ethan A Benardete; Alan B Stevens; Jason H Huang
Journal:  Am J Biomed Sci Res       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 9.  Telemedicine and Telementoring in Rhinology, Otology, and Laryngology: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Angela Yang; Dayoung Kim; Peter H Hwang; Matt Lechner
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-03-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.