| Literature DB >> 29468722 |
Yasunori Enomoto1,2, Sayomi Matsushima1,2, Shiori Meguro1, Hideya Kawasaki1, Isao Kosugi1, Tomoyuki Fujisawa2, Noriyuki Enomoto2, Naoki Inui2, Yutaro Nakamura2, Takafumi Suda2, Toshihide Iwashita1.
Abstract
Pathological differential diagnoses of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) include usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and pulmonary apical cap (PAC); however, there are no specific immunostaining makers to distinguish between these diseases. We performed immunohistochemistry using several pleural mesothelial cell-related markers, including cytokeratin-5/6, CAM5.2, WT-1, calretinin, desmin and podoplanin, for PPFE (n = 4), UIP (n = 10) and PAC (n = 3) lung sections. Among the examined markers, in PPFE and PAC lungs podoplanin commonly showed positivity for spindle cells both in thickened pleura and subpleural fibroelastosis lesions; these cells were also stained with α-smooth muscle actin, a marker of myofibroblasts. However, even in elastic fibre-rich cases, UIP lungs did not show such podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts in pleura/subpleura and fibroblastic foci. These findings were also verified using immunofluorescence. By contrast, immunohistochemically as well as morphologically, the difference between PPFE and PAC was not apparent. The presence of podoplanin-positive myofibroblasts could be a pathological hallmark of PPFE, suggesting a pathogenic process distinct from UIP but common to PAC.Entities:
Keywords: myofibroblast; pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis; podoplanin; pulmonary apical cap; usual interstitial pneumonia
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29468722 DOI: 10.1111/his.13494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Histopathology ISSN: 0309-0167 Impact factor: 5.087