Literature DB >> 29468654

Experimental evolution across different thermal regimes yields genetic divergence in recombination fraction but no divergence in temperature associated plastic recombination.

Kathryn P Kohl1, Nadia D Singh2.   

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity is pervasive in nature. One mechanism underlying the evolution and maintenance of such plasticity is environmental heterogeneity. Indeed, theory indicates that both spatial and temporal variation in the environment should favor the evolution of phenotypic plasticity under a variety of conditions. Cyclical environmental conditions have also been shown to yield evolved increases in recombination frequency. Here, we use a panel of replicated experimental evolution populations of D. melanogaster to test whether variable environments favor enhanced plasticity in recombination rate and/or increased recombination rate in response to temperature. In contrast to expectation, we find no evidence for either enhanced plasticity in recombination or increased rates of recombination in the variable environment lines. Our data confirm a role of temperature in mediating recombination fraction in D. melanogaster, and indicate that recombination is genetically and plastically depressed under lower temperatures. Our data further suggest that the genetic architectures underlying plastic recombination and population-level variation in recombination rate are likely to be distinct.
© 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental evolution; phenotypic plasticity; recombination; variable environment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29468654     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Male meiotic recombination rate varies with seasonal temperature fluctuations in wild populations of autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa.

Authors:  Andrew P Weitz; Marinela Dukic; Leo Zeitler; Kirsten Bomblies
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.622

2.  DNA Motifs Are Not General Predictors of Recombination in Two Drosophila Sister Species.

Authors:  James M Howie; Rupert Mazzucco; Thomas Taus; Viola Nolte; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.065

3.  Variation in fine-scale recombination rate in temperature-evolved Drosophila melanogaster populations in response to selection.

Authors:  Ari Winbush; Nadia D Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.542

4.  Wolbachia Infection Associated with Increased Recombination in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.154

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.