Literature DB >> 2946860

Retroactive and proactive interference effects in dual learning of blissymbolics and manual sign.

R L Luftig, H A Bersani.   

Abstract

Nonspeech systems can be either aided or unaided. Each system possess its unique learning and memory characteristics. One instructional strategy designed to give learners the advantages of both systems is dual instruction in aided and unaided communication. One problem with this approach, however, might be that of retroactive and proactive interference in learning and memory. The current experiment investigated whether dual instruction in Blissymbolics and manual (ASL) sign would lead to retroactive and proactive interference. Lists of sign/symbol referents in the two systems were taught to nonhandicapped adults in a controlled setting. No effects of retroactive or proactive interference were found. Additionally, a proactive facilitation effect was found for immediate retention. Results are discussed in terms of the nature of the task, the learning memory attributes of the nonspeech systems, and the effects of sign/symbol translucency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2946860     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  19 in total

1.  Two faces of sign: iconic and abstract.

Authors:  U Bellugi; E S Klima
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Non-speech communication symbols and systems: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  L L Lloyd; G R Karlan
Journal:  J Ment Defic Res       Date:  1984-03

3.  The role of inconicity in early sign language acquisition.

Authors:  M D Orlansky; J D Bonvillian
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-08

4.  Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss and Carrier.

Authors:  C R Clark
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1981-05

5.  The Brown-Peterson paradigm: a comparison of scoring methods.

Authors:  J J Winters
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1982-11

6.  An analysis of some shortcomings in the interference theory of forgetting.

Authors:  B J Underwood; B R Ekstrand
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Influence of iconicity and phonological similarity on sign learning by mentally retarded children.

Authors:  P L Griffith; J H Robinson
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1980-11

8.  Learning of Blissymbols and manual signs.

Authors:  D Bristow; M Fristoe
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-05

9.  Translucency of sign and concreteness of gloss in the manual sign learning of moderately/severely mentally retarded students.

Authors:  R L Luftig
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1983-11

10.  Proactive inhibition by mentally retarded persons: effects of distracter vocalization.

Authors:  J J Winters; M T Semchuk
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1982-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.