Tasuku Matsuyama1, Tomoko Fujii2, Jiro Takeuchi3, Masahiko Hara4, Tetsuhisa Kitamura5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 3. Kyoto University Health Services, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 5. Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the recent proportion and trends of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Japanese cardiovascular journals. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study retrospectively reviewed all original research articles published between 2006 and 2015 in six English-language journals issued by societies related to cardiovascular medicine in Japan. All these journals had been indexed in PubMed for more than 5 years until 2015. We examined the 2-year trends in the prevalence of RCTs, as well as the types of study subjects and interventions investigated. In addition, we applied a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the factors related to the publication of RCTs. A total of 7117 articles were eligible for our analyses. The proportion of RCTs among Japanese journals was 3.5% (252/7117). No significant change in the prevalence of RCTs among all included journals was noted (3.8% vs 3.1%, p=0.751). RCTs related to ischaemic heart disease were the most frequently published (85/252, 33.7%). In the multivariable analysis, a male first author (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.97; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.99) and reports from Asia (AOR 1.62; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.21) were significantly associated with the publication of RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese cardiovascular journals, RCTs accounted for 3.5% of all original research articles published, and there was no change in the prevalence of RCTs during the study period.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the recent proportion and trends of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Japanese cardiovascular journals. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study retrospectively reviewed all original research articles published between 2006 and 2015 in six English-language journals issued by societies related to cardiovascular medicine in Japan. All these journals had been indexed in PubMed for more than 5 years until 2015. We examined the 2-year trends in the prevalence of RCTs, as well as the types of study subjects and interventions investigated. In addition, we applied a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the factors related to the publication of RCTs. A total of 7117 articles were eligible for our analyses. The proportion of RCTs among Japanese journals was 3.5% (252/7117). No significant change in the prevalence of RCTs among all included journals was noted (3.8% vs 3.1%, p=0.751). RCTs related to ischaemic heart disease were the most frequently published (85/252, 33.7%). In the multivariable analysis, a male first author (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.97; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.99) and reports from Asia (AOR 1.62; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.21) were significantly associated with the publication of RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese cardiovascular journals, RCTs accounted for 3.5% of all original research articles published, and there was no change in the prevalence of RCTs during the study period.
Entities:
Keywords:
Japanese cardiovascular journal; prevalence; randomized controlled trials
Authors: Seth W Glickman; John G McHutchison; Eric D Peterson; Charles B Cairns; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Kevin A Schulman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul A Heidenreich; Justin G Trogdon; Olga A Khavjou; Javed Butler; Kathleen Dracup; Michael D Ezekowitz; Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Yuling Hong; S Claiborne Johnston; Amit Khera; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sue A Nelson; Graham Nichol; Diane Orenstein; Peter W F Wilson; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andrew E Moran; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Abraham Flaxman; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andrew E Moran; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Giovanni Filardo; Briget da Graca; Danielle M Sass; Benjamin D Pollock; Emma B Smith; Melissa Ashley-Marie Martinez Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-03-02